BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums banner

Deleting the Secondary Air Pump (SAP). Effects on the Beast.....

87K views 58 replies 23 participants last post by  Sailor24  
#1 ·
Ok, I know this has been discussed in depth, but I want an up to date opinion from those that are in the know. I am hoping all of the S62 gurus will give some input and put this query to rest. I will be getting a CAI kit soon, I hope, and have been stressing over what to do about the SAP. Of course the option to turn it upside down is always there, but what if I wanted to delete it all together?

Here is a thread I have been reading to get a little insight.

http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/e39-m5-e52-z8-discussion/159817-help-cold-air-intake-install.html

These are the posts that I am worried about.

I did it by accident, when I installed my Dinan CAI. Thats how I found out. Active Autowerke sold some resistors for E36's with TU engines for exactly that purpose. Im sure someone here can dig up the specs on what the DME is looking for in terms of resistance and make some up. The only issue is that the engine will continue to fuel as if the SAP was still there during warm up causing a super rich condition.
I don't think any more fuel is injected during the 2 minute period. All the secondary air system is doing is adding air to the exhaust gasses so that they burn off more of the fuel in the rich mix since the engine isn't warm enough yet to do it itself. Without the SAP the exhaust is just a little richer than usual, for 2 minutes..

I could definitely be wrong, but I don't think there is any change in engine management. In this case it is only an issue for the environment..
Fuel will be burning into the exhaust and damage the cats.

I did it by accident, when I installed my Dinan CAI. Thats how I found out. Active Autowerke sold some resistors for E36's with TU engines for exactly that purpose. Im sure someone here can dig up the specs on what the DME is looking for in terms of resistance and make some up. The only issue is that the engine will continue to fuel as if the SAP was still there during warm up causing a super rich condition.
I don't think any more fuel is injected during the 2 minute period. All the secondary air system is doing is adding air to the exhaust gasses so that they burn off more of the fuel in the rich mix since the engine isn't warm enough yet to do it itself. Without the SAP the exhaust is just a little richer than usual, for 2 minutes..

I could definitely be wrong, but I don't think there is any change in engine management. In this case it is only an issue for the environment..
Yea that's the only possible downside. I for one don't give a rats @$$ about cats..

I still want to see if there is a way to use the software to get rid of the fault code from removing the SAP.
You might as well get the entire cold start changed at that point. I wonder if Evolve can help...
You guys aren't getting the MAIN thing here... You aren't going to complete Readiness Monitors for OBD testing with ANYONES software. I fought with ESS for this exact reason, only due to some confusion between our emails.

Even if they delete the codes for Inadequate Air Flow, you still won't complete the test for OBDII monitoring. So when it comes time for OBDII testing (required in most States) you will not pass. And if you do, you will only pass with 1 readiness monitor incomplete (Secondary Air). Basically, you're Secondary Air systemm will always show up as "Not Ready."

Very annoying, I've been working on this for years. I can cure the issue on E46 cars, as I have with our Continental Tire Challenge car. But I do not have the chassis codes to do so on any other car.


As for an above post referring to "Euro Shops" being able to disable the SAP, that is incorrect. GT1, SSS, AutoLogic, yadda yadda yadda... NONE of the above (most powerfull) diagnostic equipment will turn off any such code.
Thanks for the info. So you're saying none of the ESS S/C cars will pass a standard state inspection?
Well they aren't going to pass Secondary Air readiness. So thats 1 monitor. It varies state to state, depending on year.

In NH, up to 2001, you are allowed 2 monitors "Not Ready". 2002+ and you are allowed 1 monitor. So if you aren't running cats, and the efficiency codes are deleted (no check engine light, but you still won't complete OBDII readiness for the cat) you are SOL if you also deleted the air pump.

For example, on my Trans Am, I can spend $400 bucks on tuning software, and do whatever I want. No cats, no evap, no secondary air, no heated O2s, etc. And I can still pass with flying colors, and be undetectable computer/OBDII wise.
Exactly, you'd need to actually change the code in the DME, GT1 (or any other programmer) can't do that.

PS,

Peter, I know we already discussed this, I thought it would be nice to share what you and I discussed privately...... IF you are ok with that....
 
#2 ·
Don't stress, this one is easy.

Unless you have the ability to modify the ECU programming to eliminate the entire system that is dealing with the air pump, don't even think about removing it. If you live in a state that has OBD II testing and you decide to have the ECU reprogrammed, MAKE SURE that whoever the magician is knows about readiness flags and makes sure that your will be properly set, otherwise you are in for trouble. Given what I know about the state of M5 ECU tuning, I would relocate the pump, it is not that big of a deal.
 
#3 ·
OBD2 is the downside, I think that's all there is to it.

you either fool the system into believing the SAP is there, or accept the 1 or 2 not-ready codes.
 
#4 · (Edited)
Fooling the ECU is not a bad way to go either, but it is so inelegant in an M5 hiha
 
#5 ·
Mine was deleted with the ESS kit 2 years ago. I have passed NC inspection twice since our state allows one 'not ready'. I cannot comment on its effect to the cats or the environment. I'm assuming ESS would have considered any potential ill effects on the car, but who knows.
 
#7 ·
If you are worried about the rich mixture upon cold startup destroying the cats - don't.
 
#8 ·
You are obviously aware of the Not ready issue, not an issue if the rest of the car is in top shape as yours is. The "what" this system does is get the cat working faster. It is very much like blowing on a fire that is just an ember. If you look at how many cars have this system plugged, if something bad was going to happen you would know about it already. Guy's throwing the AA code don't come back a year later and say my cats are done.

Mine is plugged on one bank and it is my intention to plumb directly to my new headers, but the headers would be on the car if I would just skip this idea. I do believe the SAP brings the whole engine up to temp faster and as far as I'm concerned that is a very good thing. That and that alone is a good enough reason to fix or keep the system. I am sure you have heard the old adage of X% of wear on an engine occurs during warm up. I figure the faster you get it up to temp the better.
 
#48 ·
You are obviously aware of the Not ready issue, not an issue if the rest of the car is in top shape as yours is. The "what" this system does is get the cat working faster. It is very much like blowing on a fire that is just an ember. If you look at how many cars have this system plugged, if something bad was going to happen you would know about it already. Guy's throwing the AA code don't come back a year later and say my cats are done.

Mine is plugged on one bank and it is my intention to plumb directly to my new headers, but the headers would be on the car if I would just skip this idea. I do believe the SAP brings the whole engine up to temp faster and as far as I'm concerned that is a very good thing. That and that alone is a good enough reason to fix or keep the system. I am sure you have heard the old adage of X% of wear on an engine occurs during warm up. I figure the faster you get it up to temp the better.

So do you still have yr SAP connected/working?

I know SAP "heats up" CATs faster...but engine?
 
#9 ·
For those that are worried about OBDII readiness it can be reinstalled pretty fast before your inspection, then removed again. Reinstall it a week or so before so the readiness monitors can reset...

In Washington we can have 1 not ready for 03 and newer, the 01's and 02's can have 2 not ready and pass...

Sounds like in Ohio, you don't need to sweat it... and if you're worried about your cats, just remove those too! :goldcup:
 
#19 ·
For those that are worried about OBDII readiness it can be reinstalled pretty fast before your inspection, then removed again. Reinstall it a week or so before so the readiness monitors can reset...

In Washington we can have 1 not ready for 03 and newer, the 01's and 02's can have 2 not ready and pass...

Sounds like in Ohio, you don't need to sweat it... and if you're worried about your cats, just remove those too! :goldcup:


you're assuming that the SA passages aren't blocked and installing it will even pass any testing.


also, cats aren't even up to temp when the SAP is running; catalytic converter damage happens when you run super rich for extended periods of time and have too much hydrocarbon combustion in the cataytic cells, extremely-poor ignition timing can also be an issue.
 
#18 ·
#16 ·
I want air pump 24/7

I want mine to run all the time when at idle, not just a start up.
Love the off beat super cammy sound.

Apples
 
#22 ·
I tried to delete this today... Here is my solution Pics included.

I have tried to come up with a solution to delete the Secondary Air Pump a few times. I have not had much success in trying to delete the air pump until today. BTW my motor and solenoide work great I just would rather preserve the motor for when I need it. I first unplugged it.. knowing that that was not going to work but, I thought I would try it.
I then tried to use just a resistior this did not work as I saw a pending code show up right away with my scan tool.
what I did was use a little hoppy motor, btw this is just like the ones used in door lock actuators. Its just a little motor.

I wired this into the plug that goes to the SAI motor. I used heat shrink and connectors from McMasterCarr.

I hope this continues to work. I will let you know if I have any issues..

BP
 

Attachments

#25 ·
The DME can only monitor things it is directly connected to like the secondary air valve and the relay for the pump. It doesn't directly power the pump and has no way of monitoring it so I don't think the little motor you have installed will make any difference.

As sailor's table shows, the DME has a pretty clever way of monitoring the whole SA system by looking for a certain O2 sensor response. That's what makes it so difficult to fool.
 
#32 ·
missfire on start up...replace or remove SAP?





I seem to be having some similar issues to what i am guessing you (twiggy) had and i was curious as to what your solve ended up being. i have a 2000 M5 with 70k miles on it. after having it a month, i got all sorts of codes all at once... secondary air too low, missfire on all cyl on cold start, fuel adaption on both banks and Mass air meter plausibility ...

When i started my car in the mornings, it would never stall or do anything odd, just that the air pump was REALLY loud for 90 seconds, i thought this was normal until i had a shop tell me oh yeah you need to replace that, clear the codes then see what happens.

its only after the car is warm when i then turn it off, a short amount of time goes by (less than a hour) when i turn it back on and i get a very rough idol for a min or so then i get the missfire codes. Other than that the car drives very very good.

What did you end up doing to solve your SAP issue/missfire codes?