Very true Sir.For me, I don't care how high it revs. I've had plenty of cars that rev past 8,000 rpms. They all have one thing in common, no torque until high rpm. Everyone brags about how much horsepower they have, but what they really love is torque. One of the reasons I love BMW's diesels so much is the torque in any gear feeling. 7,000 rpm's is plenty for me. I can't wait to see the torque figures.
I saw another photo (really a video frame) with the temp gauge in the operating range and the tach redline was still the same. Perhaps the moving redline ring won't be on the F10 M5 or at least was not on the pre-production car in the video.
Looks like 7150 - 7200 is it. But this is more than the 7000 redline of the X5M and X6M motors.
I'm with you 110%. Some people just love their N/A high revving motors, lack of torque or not, partially due to the sound of a high strung motor. I think it allows them to pretend they're driving a "race car." :wroom:For me, I don't care how high it revs. I've had plenty of cars that rev past 8,000 rpms. They all have one thing in common, no torque until high rpm. Everyone brags about how much horsepower they have, but what they really love is torque. One of the reasons I love BMW's diesels so much is the torque in any gear feeling. 7,000 rpm's is plenty for me. I can't wait to see the torque figures.
I agree. I am going to stcik with my M6 and shall either get a stroker or the G Power kit.Proud to be a V10 "ricer." Except with the stroker I now have a high revving, yet torquey engine. Can't say enough about what Dinan has done to the V10. For those few who decide against the F10, rest assured there is still another option.
there is no "pretending" to drive a "race car" in the S85 M6, it is a street legal race coupe with the heart of an F1 beast. There is no lack of torque for street driving, it is perfect in the history of what M was.I'm with you 110%. Some people just love their N/A high revving motors, lack of torque or not, partially due to the sound of a high strung motor. I think it allows them to pretend they're driving a "race car." :wroom:
When I was growing up, these same types of people existed. They drove Honda Civics or S2000s, and bragged about hp per liter. We called them ricers. :flag:
m630 said:I dont want to argue either, but trust me, as a daily drive the S85 M6 has plenty of torque for street driving, you cant imagine how fast the RPMs move up the powerband - and note i did not say street racing or drag racing from a dig, but if you drive the car on Americans streets, roads and highways, there is nothing more that anyone needs, thats the facts of life in a world governed by 65mph limits on highways and 35mph limits on local roads, there is absolutely no more power or torque needed than that which the S85 produces.
Verbs (the poster you're responding to) actually has an S85 M5 and still he feels it needs more torque. If you go through this thread: http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/e60-m5-e61-m5-touring-discussion/164696-i-wish-my-m5-had.html you will notice many other owners of the S85 would like more torque!m630 said:There are No "ricers" as you call them here, but if you owned the S85, you would understand, there is NO comparison to toys like a Honda Civic or S2000 with a loud muffler
YawnWhy do we need to trust you? I have an S85 and I feel like it needs more torque, especially down in the low RPMs. The E63, E55, GTR, 997TT, and Z06 (among many others) all have comparable horsepower numbers but with much more torque. Heck even the E39 M5 has more torque in the lower RPMs....
Verbs (the poster you're responding to) actually has an S85 M5 and still he feels it needs more torque. If you go through this thread: http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/e60-m5-e61-m5-touring-discussion/164696-i-wish-my-m5-had.html you will notice many other owners of the S85 would like more torque!
My post was not intended to deride the new F10. I was just merely suggesting the stroker as an option for those who preferred naturally aspiration.I think the new M5 is going to be an absolute monster. And even if the factory holds back, which won't surprise me too much if they do, you can get as much or more performance from the new M5 for a quarter of the price that you had to pay for your stroker motor from Dinan.
M6 a street legal race coupe? :3: Come on, who are you kidding? It's a fast car with an awesome motor don't ge me wrong, but is no where near a race car nor does it have the heart of an F1 beast.there is no "pretending" to drive a "race car" in the S85 M6, it is a street legal race coupe with the heart of an F1 beast. There is no lack of torque for street driving, it is perfect in the history of what M was.
:eek7: There are No "ricers" as you call them here, but if you owned the S85, you would understand, there is NO comparison to toys like a Honda Civic or S2000 with a loud muffler :3:
Not everyone has 35 mph speed limits on local roads, and if you think for a moment everyone here abides to the letter of a 65mph highway speed limit, you have another coming to you.I dont want to argue either, but trust me, as a daily drive the S85 M6 has plenty of torque for street driving, you cant imagine how fast the RPMs move up the powerband - and note i did not say street racing or drag racing from a dig, but if you drive the car on Americans streets, roads and highways, there is nothing more that anyone needs, thats the facts of life in a world governed by 65mph limits on highways and 35mph limits on local roads, there is absolutely no more power or torque needed than that which the S85 produces.
The race coupe statement was a joke, for the second time, and yes, just read all about it, the S85 is derived from what BMW learned in F1, those are the facts.M6 a street legal race coupe? :3: Come on, who are you kidding? It's a fast car with an awesome motor don't ge me wrong, but is no where near a race car nor does it have the heart of an F1 beast.
Turbo lag will be minimal, and one could say the lack of low end torque in the S85 is lag in itself. That said, how having more torque down low and more power up top lead to a less useable powerband? Quite the contrary, that's the definition of a more useable powerband. Power EVERYWHERE.