Joined
·
3,068 Posts
Hi guys,
For months people have been asking us to release some figures for our power tuning for our normal package.
As most of you know most of our work has been based mainly on cars with intakes, headers and actually developing hardware.
The latest flash/remap was developed some time ago. Some members from the UK have already had flashes and seen some good figures but for us just a few cars is not enough.
So - here you go but as usual with our style of respresenting data to show that everything was kept consistent. Many of the graph this forum is used to are literally just some graphs not showing any correction factors. This is such an important part of the game because correction factors change power output so much and keeping consistency is incredibly important.
The two most effective correction factors are intake temperature and barometric pressure. We have shown these to be almost exactly consistent between runs on the below graphs.
Also, we would like to point out that these graphs are not the same shape and that the gains are in realistic rpm's. Gaining power at the very low rpm's (below 2500rpm) are not realistic as not alot is going on at below 2500rpm with respect to airspeed!
Let us know what you think!
Evolve Software V1.3 - Tests carried out on bone stock car with 90,000 miles:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Some quick notes:
The slight dip at 4750rpm is due to a large change in the vanos profile. We can get rid of this with ignition timing but we have to account for low grade fuels.
Please take note that our before and after graphs are different shapes and therefore not phase shifts in anyway shape or form (correction factors prove this)
Our RPM calibration is 100% accurate and yes this tuned car has got 7100rpm limit.
We are using thye highest recorded stock run (on a dyno dynamics 327RWHP is a damn good figure to get!) vs the average post tune run rather than what many tuning companies are well known for doing - lowest pre-run vs highest post-run!
We hope you like the way we have represtented the data in a clear and concise way with respect to accurate RPM calibration and correction factor data.
For months people have been asking us to release some figures for our power tuning for our normal package.
As most of you know most of our work has been based mainly on cars with intakes, headers and actually developing hardware.
The latest flash/remap was developed some time ago. Some members from the UK have already had flashes and seen some good figures but for us just a few cars is not enough.
So - here you go but as usual with our style of respresenting data to show that everything was kept consistent. Many of the graph this forum is used to are literally just some graphs not showing any correction factors. This is such an important part of the game because correction factors change power output so much and keeping consistency is incredibly important.
The two most effective correction factors are intake temperature and barometric pressure. We have shown these to be almost exactly consistent between runs on the below graphs.
Also, we would like to point out that these graphs are not the same shape and that the gains are in realistic rpm's. Gaining power at the very low rpm's (below 2500rpm) are not realistic as not alot is going on at below 2500rpm with respect to airspeed!
Let us know what you think!
Evolve Software V1.3 - Tests carried out on bone stock car with 90,000 miles:
Some quick notes:
The slight dip at 4750rpm is due to a large change in the vanos profile. We can get rid of this with ignition timing but we have to account for low grade fuels.
Please take note that our before and after graphs are different shapes and therefore not phase shifts in anyway shape or form (correction factors prove this)
Our RPM calibration is 100% accurate and yes this tuned car has got 7100rpm limit.
We are using thye highest recorded stock run (on a dyno dynamics 327RWHP is a damn good figure to get!) vs the average post tune run rather than what many tuning companies are well known for doing - lowest pre-run vs highest post-run!
We hope you like the way we have represtented the data in a clear and concise way with respect to accurate RPM calibration and correction factor data.
