My thought is just keep your car. I can't see you being ahead, financially, selling your car, buying a newer one, and paying for labor to swap all of the parts. We need some high milage data anyway!
:cheers:
:cheers:
There are a lot of unknowns in buying a replacement car that can't be factored in to your analysis. Miles are simply an indicator, not a bottom line value, as some 100k mile cars run better and are more reliable than other 40k mile cars. Economically, it always makes more sense to run a car into the ground than replace it. I would stand pat and keep your existing car.Carrera2RS said:What d'ya reckon is my best plan ?!?!
I agree. You know where this car has been and how it has been treated. Why risk another vehicle and its history? Cars are all depreciating assets, so just drive and understand depreciation and repair are part of the costs of ownership. If you use, say, $.25/mile just for the loss in value over time (ignore other costs of ownership for a moment), and you add an extra 10,000 miles a year, that works out to an extra $2500 a year. Divide by the amount of pleasure you get, and I think you will see the cost is not at all exorbitant! :biggrin: Of course, YMMV! cherrsagaiJaeger said:There are a lot of unknowns in buying a replacement car that can't be factored in to your analysis. Miles are simply an indicator, not a bottom line value, as some 100k mile cars run better and are more reliable than other 40k mile cars. Economically, it always makes more sense to run a car into the ground than replace it. I would stand pat and keep your existing car.