BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums banner

Bilstein B8 Ride Height/Spring Info

49K views 88 replies 22 participants last post by  FlyBMW  
KevinC
Bilstein B8
Stock springs

RF: 617mm (+5mm)
LF: 617mm
RR: 608mm (+ 12mm)
LR: 608mm
Stagger: 9mm lower in rear

These measurements confirm that the B8 do add some ride height and the reduced stagger shows there may be some validity to the rear perch height variance.

Image
Rontgen: Are you suggesting that the latest version of the rear B8 shock still has the spring perch located too high ? I was under the impression from KevinC posting that Bilstein has made changes to the location of the rear spring perch on the B8 shock and took care of the high ride-height issue.
 
Well, I'm being very careful how I word it since I don't have a B8 and a stock strut here to compare. At some point in the not-so-distant future I will have both on hand and will take some measurements to see once and for all.

I thought the discussion in Kevin's thread ended with some pics from 3+ years ago that showed the same part number that Bilstein recently recommended (meaning that perhaps the new part number is not actually a new part)? Or did I misunderstand?
It was my understanding from Kevin's thread that Bilstein has recently listed the rear B8 shock exclusively for M5 fitment only with no stipulation that the shock should be fitted with aftermarket lowering spring. This may have led to the current assumption that Bilstein might have modified the rear spring perch to allow the use of stock M5 rear springs, despite the fact that they didn't change the part number.

If this is true, then it would be interesting to get the right heights from cars that were fitted with the older version of the B8s with stock springs to see if indeed this is true about the latest ride-height revision on the rear B8 shocks.
 
Rontgen: Not meant to be nit-picking but why are your pre-installation ride heights slightly lower than your previous pre-installation measurements in your May 3, 2016 posting, especially in the rears. Just being curious. You mentioned you had a full tank of gas when you did your measurements last May so the measured ride height in the rear should have been the lowest.
 
Rontgen: I am still struggling with my math on the B8 rear shock with stock spring raising the ride height. You measured the Bilstein rear B8 shocks to be 30mm shorter than stock Sach shock. I believe you mentioned specifically that the fully extended piston rod is 30mm shorter on the B8. You also measured the spring perch to be 8mm higher on the B8 than stock. So if you mount the fully assembled B8 shock (with the compressed stock spring) to the top mounting location on the rear speaker shelf, you would have to raise the lower trailing arm about 30mm just to be able to line-up and insert the lower mounting pinch bolt. So I am struggling on understanding how a shorter B8 shock body (length from top of extended piston rod to bottom mounting point) can raise the overall ride height when compared to the much longer OEM shock. I must be missing on something here.
 
Yes, I was referencing the measurement numbers from another thread. Sorry for the confusion. I do understand to some extent that the final ride height is determined by the spring rate and the gas pressure inside the shock (how much the piston rod will be compressed by the weight of the car). I was just amazed that the shorter rear B8 (shorter than stock by 30mm) in combination with the stock spring still yield higher ride height at the rear. The piston rod on the OEM Sach must really get compressed a lot more (more than 30mm) by the weight of the car to have lower ride height than the B8 and that seems like OEM rear shocks (which is supposed to be an M5 sport-setting shock) are not anywhere as firm or stiff as the B8.
 
Having just installed Bilstein B8's as part of a B12 kit on my 03 540i M Sport perhaps I can shed a little light.

First, my car has (had) the same M5 aluminum M Sport shocks.

The rear perches on brand new B8's are still a couple of mm higher than the OEM shock. B8's for the 540 and M5 I believe list the same. But so what, match the Billies with the right spring and it's irrelevant.

The front B8 is much more a match to the original sport damper in terms of working with the factory spring than a B6 would be. You do not want B6's for this application.

Again, I installed a B12 kit, the Eibach springs are available here in the US and work and fit *perfectly* with the B8's.

Pre-install height was 606mm front, 597mm rear. As reference, I believe the 540i M sport front springs are a bit different than M5 due to slight difference in weight.

Post install height is 597mm front and rear.

If you decide to go with Bilsteins, I would pair them with Eibach's or Intrax before OEM springs. In my experience Bilsteins tend to work poorly with OEM springs with a resultant hard ride. Eibach's are perfect with B8's and matched for this car. Using the stock springs will also result in unwanted gain in ride height.

Again, Bilsteins for this car are magic, they handle way better than the OEM dampers and ride extremely well. I would not hesitate on Bilsteins for this car for a second. Floaty feelings are gone and it takes bad road and bumps without any drama.

As below, stock damper vs B8.

Image


Image
Bostonaudi: The Eibach's website only lists application for 540i and not the M5. So are you saying their 540's springs are good enough for the M5 despite the slight difference in weight between the 2 models ?