BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums banner
1 - 4 of 4 Posts

83 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
It always seemed fairly obvious to me that a driver's shift speed would affect his 1/4 mile drag race ET and trap speed. To me, this makes natural sense. So when my own meager "BMW Performance Steering Wheel" 1/4 mile drag results (about as inaccurate as it gets) came under fire, I quickly pointed out that I'm a slow shifter on my 6MT, and this would surely account for my mediocre results. To my surprise, my explanation was vigorously attacked by a self-proclaimed BMW know-it-all and self-proclaimed drag racing expert -- Sticky. He said my car was weak and that's why it performed so poorly. That was a drum he's never quit beating, in spite of all of the data to the contrary.

But I'll admit, I'm a novice with drag fact I really don't know anything about it. But I do know that if two identical cars take off from the same point at the same time and one of them waits two seconds between every shift, then while it's coasting in neutral it will not be accelerating. Therefore, it will be impossible for that car to have the same 1/4 mile trap speed of the same car that shifts as fast as it can.

I sat on one end of the debate -- as a newbie who never drag raced a car in my life, and at the other end was this self-proclaimed know-it-all of everything. He insisted he was right...and I was wrong. So more than a year ago, I asked him to prove it at the drag strip by running some of his runs in D2 mode instead of D5 (or S6). No surprise to anybody who knows how he hates to be proven wrong...he refused with some flimsy excuse that he was out to set records...not run experiments. Back in my corner, I produced CarTest physics-based car modeling software results that showed exactly how shift speed affects trap speed. Back in his corner, he laughed every time I used car test. Back in my corner, I laughed everytime he laughed at CarTest because CarTest has proven dead-nuts accurate for every performance prediction on my own car . In fact CarTest has proven so accurate that it's been within a few hundredths of a MPH on my Mojave Mile results.

I believed this would be a very easy test to run...all I needed was a car owner with DCT and a vBox. The test to figure this out would be quite simple. Run the DCT in D2 and compare the vBox results against the same car running in D5. Even though the shift speed difference between D2 and D5 is only a few milliseconds, I was hopeful it would prove the results one way or the other. Now all I needed was to find the car and test it. I ended up waiting more than a year until I got my answer.

This weekend, I borrowed a guy's DCT car and took it to a remote road in the desert that was nearly perfectly flat in both direction. There are no side streets, except the ones I would use for the tests. I planned to place the car in D2 and turn on the vBox. I would run from 0-130 MPH -- as this would give me 1/4 and 60-130 MPH results. I would run the car in both directions on the same exact piece of road for three runs in each direction (six runs total), then I would switch to D5 and run the same test all over again.

The car I borrowed was nearly bone stock. Bone stock is ideal because if the results are obvious with a bone stock car, they will be even more obvious and exaggerated on a highly modified car (such as a supercharged car). So taking a near bone stock car for the test was also going to make it the most difficult for me, and give the naysayers all of the benefits.

I found the perfect road, hooked up my Video vBox and tried one practice run in each direction to make sure the road was safe. After I was satisfied, I turned on the vBox and ran in one direction. Then I ran in the opposite direction. Back and forth three times for a total of six runs. I switched to D5 and repeated the runs. I was running low on gas, so after two runs in each direction (instead of three), I abandoned the third set of runs and went home.

The results were overwhelmingly conclusive. Even though I was only changing the shift speed by a few milliseconds, the effect on 1/4 mile trap speed was obvious and I'd say even profound. Wasting a few milliseconds shifting affected my 1/4 mile trap speed by as much as 2MPH. Even the best D2 run couldn't beat the worst D5 run. Sticky was wrong...again. That's right: the self-proclaimed expert of drag racing and all automotive knowledge was proven dead wrong again.

As a final test, I input all of the actual car data in CarTest to see if it could predict the same results. If it did, it would be (yet) another slap in the face to the self-proclaimed expert who regularly mocks the use of this tool. I just happen to have the Dynojet dyno file from this exact car taken only a few weeks ago. CarTest allows the user to input the actual dyno results. After doing so, I adjusted the launch methods to match how I used the DCT. For D2, I selected a 0.20 second shift time (200 milliseconds). I chose this shift time after some research on three or four different car forums and other web sites who claimed that 0.20 seconds was about the slowest the DCT would shift (D2 mode). For D5, I selected 0.08 seconds shift time (80 milliseconds). In input the exact weather conditions I collected during my run, including elevation and wind speed and wind direction. Then changing nothing but shift speed, I let CarTest estimate the 1/4 mile ET and trap speed, along with a 60-130 MPH time as well.

Here's the results.

Weather Conditions:
Temperature: 55.9 degrees F
Pressure: 30.04 inHg
Humidity: 27%
Density Altitude: 30 Ft.

CarTest Estimates for D2:
1/4 Mile Elapsed Time (ET): _ 12.65
1/4 Mile Trap Speed: ________ 112.55
60-130 MPH: _________________ 12.63

Actual Results for D2:
_______________________________Run-1, _Run-2, _Run-3, _Run-4, _Run-5, _Run-6
1/4 Mile Elapsed Time (ET): _ 13.208, 13.612, 13.412, 13.204, 13.177, 13.521
1/4 Mile Trap Speed: ________ 112.93, 112.23, 112.81, 112.84, 113.26, 112.13
60-130 MPH: _________________ 12.595, 12.435, 12.512, 12.504, 12.411, 12.456

Average Results for D2 (average of three medium runs):
1/4 Mile Elapsed Time (ET): _ 13.276
1/4 Mile Trap Speed: ________ 112.86
60-130 MPH: _________________ 12.537

CarTest Estimates for D5:

1/4 Mile Elapsed Time (ET): _ 12.48
1/4 Mile Trap Speed: ________ 113.83
60-130 MPH: _________________ 12.20

Actual Results for D5:
_______________________________Run-1, _Run-2, _Run-3, _Run-4, _Run-5, _Run-6
1/4 Mile Elapsed Time (ET): _ 13.135, 12.987,, 13.034
1/4 Mile Trap Speed: ________ 113.35, 114.09, xxx.xx, 113.62
60-130 MPH: _________________ 12.147, 12.104,, 12.128

Average Results for D5 (average of three medium runs):
1/4 Mile Elapsed Time (ET): _ 13.052
1/4 Mile Trap Speed: ________ 113.69
60-130 MPH: _________________ 12.13

To me, the results seem pretty conclusive. Even changing the shift speed by 120 milliseconds (or whatever the actual value may be between D2 and D5) created a pretty significant change in all 1/4 mile drag results, and 60-130 times as well. As I believed at the very beginning, shift speed does affect trap speed, no matter what the self-proclaimed drag race expert seems to think.

CarTest results proved to be very accurate as well. The D2 predictions vs. actual results were about as close as they could get. 1/4 mile ET was predicted to be 12.65, actual was 13.26 (4.7% difference). 1/4 Trap Speed was predicted to be 112.55, actual was 112.86 (3/10ths of 1% difference). 60-130 time was predicted to be 12.63, actual was 12.537 (less than 1/10th of 1% difference).

The D5 predictions vs. actual results . 1/4 mile ET was predicted to be 12.48, actual was 13.052 (4.4% difference). 1/4 Trap Speed was predicted to be 113.83, actual was 113.69 (1/10th of 1% difference). 60-130 time was predicted to be 12.20, actual was 12.13 (1/2 of 1% difference).

Trap speed and 60-130 MPH results were both less than 1/2 of 1% difference from the predictions for both D2 and D5. CarTest predicted 1.28 MPH trap speed difference, and the actual was 0.83 MPH difference. CarTest predicted an 0.15 second difference for 60-130 MPH runs, and the actual difference was 0.407 seconds. And even though 1/4 mile ET was 4.4% off, Cartest predicted a 0.17 second difference, and the actual results were 0.224 second difference.

VBox files will be made available for analysis to anybody curious enough to dive into the results.

VBox Results (I've highlighted the shift points):

Car Test Configuration:

Additional Information:

I did a little more digging into the results, and it's very clear that clutch engagement time is different between D2 and D5. I looked at the 60-foot times, and it's clear that the clutch engagement is faster in D5 than D2.

At the same time, I exported as much data from the runs as I thought made sense. I tried making some graphs of the data, but nothing was nearly as clear as simply presenting the data itself.

1/4 Mile results:
Even though these aren't actual drag strip results, I tried to simulate them as best as I could using the VBox tools software. I did my best to look up the NHRA rules and figure out how times, distances, and trap speeds are measured. Then using what I learned, I programmed the VBox software to simulate the same thing. For example, I used a 1-foot roll-out, and the trap speed is the average of the speed at 1321ft, and 1257ft (Q-60 ft, with 1-foot roll-out).

Gear Analysis: Time in Gears

Gear Analysis: Distance in Gears

Speed Analysis: Time to Speed

Speed Analysis: Distance to Speed

Video:YouTube - BMW DCT Speed Test: Testing the affects of shift speed on performance

49,475 Posts
Interesting. And yes of course D5 is fastest shifting mode :)

Here is my little more unscientific test :)

Great acceleration 0-100 / 0-200 / 0-60 is possible with RWD, DCT and great tyres (Michelin Pilot Supersport).

I was surprised that I without Launch Control and only in M Dynamic Mode and D5 mode was able to set 11,3 s from 0-200 km/h :M5rev: We are talking faster 0-200 km/h than 4WD Porsche Panamera Turbo with Powerkit for example. Just a tad slower than the Lamborghini LP560-4 and Porsche 911 Turbo PDK (997 Mk II).

OK, it helps with G-Power Supercharger and 295 mm wide tyres in the rear but still it is some great performance I beleive for a 2WD car and brings hopes for the new BMW M5 F10. Please see below for the GPS-verifired acceleration time.

YouTube - 11,3 s 0-200 km/h GPS verified (no LC) G-Power SKII CS BMW M3 DCT DKG

<iframe width="853" height="510" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></ifra

49,475 Posts
However, you always have to wait 0,5 s or similar when launcing to avoid slippage of the DCT at the start? You can definetly not "brakeboost" the car as an automatic :)

1 - 4 of 4 Posts