Buh Bye BMW? 2008 M5 Order Canceled. [Safety concerns after IIHS test results] - Page 8 - BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums

Go Back   BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums > General Forums > Off Topic Forum

Off Topic Forum This is the place for mature discussions not necessarily related to cars. This is however also moderated and only registered members are allowed to post. No religion and no vicious attacks.


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 20th August 2007, 03:45   #71
JJF
Member, Sport: On DSC: On (>100 posts)
 
JJF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Diego, CA

Garage: 2008 BMW ///M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 11
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ View Post
From the IIHS:

"Side impacts are the second most common fatal crash type after frontal crashes. About 9,200 people in passenger vehicles were killed in side impacts in 2005. In crashes with other passenger vehicles during 2004-05, 49 percent of driver deaths in 1-3-year-old cars and minivans occurred in side impacts, up from 31 percent in 1980-81. During the same time, the proportion of driver deaths in frontal crashes declined from 61 to 46 percent."


I am not insulted by some of the responses, just a little surprised. I just can't believe that some people are blowing off a crash test that BMW should have passed with flying colors. It's a far cry from from what the IIHS said in 1997 about the frontal test. Here's a quote my post in 2004:

"When the 1997 E39 5 Series was offset crash tested, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety President Brian O'Neill said that if all cars crashed like the BMW 5 series, they could shut down their testing. Remember, the IIHS is privately funded by insurance companies. The US Government testing done by NHTSA utilizes the full frontal crashes which are not as "real world" as the IIHS offset tests."

Here is the 2004 thread which raises questions about the EURO test also:

Crash Woes for E60 5 Series!!!

The IIHS tests are the BEST thing to happen to auto safety. The institute which is funded by the insurance industry to reduce costs has effectively EMBARRASSED cars companies to make safer cars. The insurance companies pay out less in claims and fewer people die or are maimed. We all win.

I would like to see the IIHS crash a 2004-2007 model to see if the test is the same, since we have no base-line test for the 5 series in a side impact crash. This would show if the design was never good or the 2008 interior door panel redesign is solely the culprit.

Some of the above responses to my original post still don't change my belief that BMW should have ranked in the top tier in this test. THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENT I WAS TRYING TO CONVEY. I was emotionally torqued that something that I thought was a "given" proved not to be. Mattel, the largest toy company in the world, just let parents and kids down with magnets that fall out of Polly Pocket toys and lead paint on some Sesame Street Toys. BMW has also let us down because our expectations are high and we thought a high mark on this test was fundamental for a BMW.

My 2008 M5 order was placed thinking I had the best possible cocoon surrounding me and my family in an unparalleled performance sedan. BMW let me down with last week's results. I still don't take that lightly and you shouldn't either.

MJ
'06 M5 Silver Grey
MJ---I think that we were all disappointed by the test results. We love the M5 and know that it's the best performance sedan out there (BTW, "cocoon" and "performance" should not belong in the same sentence--IMHO). I'm a big BMW fan as well, but I know that although the M5 is probably agile enough to get me out of just about any situation, no car can get you out the "perfect" crash. That's what these tests demonstrate. If you really want a super safe performance car, I'd get the Volvo or Acura and mod the heck out of them. Or, just keep your M5
__________________
PCH CA1

2008 ///M5 Alpine White/ Sepang perforated (100% of options)
JJF is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 04:20   #72
Wayward
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
Wayward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA

Garage: 2006 M6 - SB/Black

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 46
Thanked 77 Times in 61 Posts
Since I'm a mod here, I felt the need to ask posting advice from a non-mod.

Here's what I got:
Hmmm, ok, MJ, you posted a thread and won't acknowledge responses from those trying to help, especially if those responses don't jive with your predisposition.

Are you hoping to extract some type of retribution against BMW (as in hey, members, dump your M5s, they're not crashworthy)?

Fine.

But your pedisposition prompts this question -- why the the post in the first place?

This is something you've yet to acknowledge. I undertstand perfectly those who want only yes-men in response to their questions, but since that hasn't occurred, (and yes, we've seen your response to date) how will you continue to respond?

Should you acquiesce to other posters and acquire a 10 ton battle tank?

Why did you post? What were you expecting here? Should we all just shut up and coddle? Recent efforts to help you have gone unanswered.

Lastly, are the odds approximately 1000 to 1 that you won't respond to any of this?

If you agree with no one here, and/or if no one can help you here, why post at all?

The bottom line is that if you're that disturbed, buy something and post photos of your purchase. Simple, really.

That's not to say that everyone's crying towels are in the washing machine, I'm sure that there are a few available for lending. Oops, did any of this hurt your feelings?
Ok, now, as a mod, I must say that that response is quite harsh, no matter how realistic. The thought that anyone here can't handle life in general is simply abhoric (is that a word?). I'm sure that MJ will respond (in a non-hostile, courteous fashion, of course) quite soon, at any rate.
Wayward is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 04:21   #73
#1ofmany
Junior Member, warming up (<31 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central, FL

Garage: Black, m3

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
WOW

MJ,

WOW....What a turn this thread has taken. I also thought that most readers would be more interested in the safety of these machines. I remember when I was back in school, almost ten years ago now, my sister and mother were involved in a side impact crash. The crash involved was her then '88 325is and like a 1985 Ford F150. The car was totaled, but my mother who was on the passenger side, also the side that was hit, walked away just a little shaken. The car performed wonderfully!! That was the day that I said when I get out of school I wanted a BMW. After school, I found out just how safe these cars were by reading all about the test and so on. I know that you can't really pay for safety but I think that once again that some heads need to roll on this issue at BMW. Enough excuses, just fix the issue, redesign, do whatever is necessary. You never know what can happen, or whose fault it may be but I think that with the knowledge that we have, we should use it for our and our family's safety. Maybe if more of us canceled our upcoming orders or traded in there would be more urgency to take some action. Simply unbelievable! IMHO It seems that looking into the issue and a cabin redesign could fix this rather quickly.


DRE

Last edited by #1ofmany; 20th August 2007 at 06:21.
#1ofmany is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 04:28   #74
Wayward
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
Wayward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA

Garage: 2006 M6 - SB/Black

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 46
Thanked 77 Times in 61 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1ofmany View Post
Maybe if more of us canceled our upcoming orders or traded in there would be more urgency to take some action. Simply unbelievable!
Good for you #1ofmany!

In the aftermath of your cancellation, what have you ordered?
Wayward is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 04:53   #75
MJ
Member, P500 Sport, DSC off (>900)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Florida, USA

Garage: F10 M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Gustav,

I move to have WAYWARD removed as a moderator. His behavior is bizarre and unbecoming of this site.

MJ
MJ is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 05:35   #76
chunpng
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
chunpng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Altos, California

Garage: M5, silver/black

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ View Post
This has always been a civilized board with a clientele a cut above other message boards. When did this change?

MJ
CHARTER MEMBER
One main reason I read here but rarely post. My impression is that this is not a forum where people discuss cars in a civil manner, like the E39 forum I started with in 2001. Yes, 2001.

The E60 Forum has many cult-like members who think anyone who does not appreciate/own an SMG-equipped E60 is mentally retarded in all things auto, and will not hesitate to 'educate' the uninitiated with tough-love messages.

I have owned BMWs since 1985. The E39 M5 was my last BMW. I will NEVER buy a new BMW again, especially an E60 M5. Way before this IIHS crash story came about (late last week I think), I have decided that the new BMWs are inferior cars. Not that it makes much difference to forum members here, but the E60 M5 came in third in a 3-sedan comparo, loosing to Audi and MB. Yet one post on this thread mentioned 'hundreds of rave reviews for the M5'. The blinders-on mentality here is stunning.

The humiliation is not reserved only for the M5, the regular E60 5 series lost twice to the Infiniti M. I cannot recall the last time this happened.

CP
__________________
CP
00 Titanium Silver: 6/00-1/05 RIP
95 Black Metallic RUF BTR-2
07 Meteor Grey Cayman

Last edited by chunpng; 20th August 2007 at 07:20.
chunpng is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 07:11   #77
azwdct
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Garage: 2002 BMW Z8

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Unfortunately, I must agree with MJ and chunpng--people do not seem to discuss the issues raised here in a civil manner (there are, of course exceptions, and thank you to those respectful, thoughtful posters).

I thought I would offer my .02, for whatever it is worth. As I have said in previous posts, I have been a very loyal BMW customer. As we all know, BMW charges a premium for their vehicles, the e60 m5, included. With the incentives offered by MB for the e63, the pricing of the Audi S6, etc., there are other more "economical" alternatives out there. While I can not speak for everyone, I can only speak for myself and one of the reasons I have purchased BMW's is because of their engineering--not only in terms of performance, but the technology that works when we don't know it, especially in terms of safety and crash protection. I opted for the e60 initially because I wanted performance and practicality--I needed a four door to take my boys around in, but I wanted the performance of my Z8. Now, I have had several reliability issues with my e60 that resulted in me no longer having the vehicle (I will not bore you with the details). So, in contemplating a successor, I was considering another m5, possibly a 550 sport (just for fuel economy), and no matter what I chose, I was going to stay within the BMW family. However, with the latest test results and BMW's somewhat dismissive response to it, the e60 is no longer an option for me. I understand everyone's point regarding the "perfect crash", how we should just enjoy driving, etc., but, when it comes down to it, I expect certain things for the premiums we pay. Next to Porsche, BMW has the highest profit margin of any other manufacturer for its vehicles. Its dealers acknowledge that its cars are too expensive to compete effectively in certain segments (most recently the new x5 prior to offering incentives). Such a premium must be justified in the consumers' eyes. For some, performance is enough. For others, including myself, it is not. Imho I do not think it is acceptable that a car as highly engineered as the e60 should perform so poorly in a test that has been given so much attention over the last few years. Interestingly BMW is dismissing it now, but when it was publicized that the e39 performed so well, BMW beat the safety drum as loudly as anyone. Maybe there is a slim chance of being in such an accident where this shortcoming in terms of protection would be realized, but I am not willing to take that chance with my family and friends and, just because others feel the same, does not mean they deserve the responses they have received, particularly from moderators.
azwdct is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 07:16   #78
KIP
Member, P500 Sport, DSC On (>700)
 
KIP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern Europe

Garage: PTT

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 38
Thanked 61 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ View Post
I am so disturbed by the side impact debacle, I am seriously considering walking away from my week 36 build Space Grey M5. After FIVE M5s I truly feel let down. I never thought I had to worry about a last place crash test. I just thought the German engineers had my back. Or in this case my ribs and internal organs.

If I were to walk away from the 2008 on order what should I consider? I am truly looking for input as this has seriously rattled my confidence...

MJ
1992 325i
1998 540i6
2000 X5
2000 M5
2001 M5
2001 Z8
2002 M5
2003 M5
2003 X5
2004 X5
2006 M5
2007 X5
2008 M5????
Poor safety (there is just no excuse for the 5series results, because they are excuses as excellent safety should be acquired easily in these modern times and all other car manufacturers have) and quality were the 2 (HUGE) main reasons I bought a Mercedes E55 AMG after 4 BMW's. I have to admit it will be hard going back after the positive experience I have had with this car. I thought I would have never bought a Merc over a BMW. I also have to add that the BMW service stations here in Finland are so appalling in quality that owning an unreliable car would be hell.

Last edited by KIP; 20th August 2007 at 07:22.
KIP is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 07:29   #79
Marchitect
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
Marchitect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern CA

Garage: 2008 M5 - Space Gray

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ View Post
I am still waiting to get a few suggestions for a possible replacement for the E60. I want a four door monster with the drivability that I desire and I am afraid the M5 might be one of the few that meets the demand.

Any comments on the RS4????

MJ
try your best not to get into a side impact situation. But if you must, go for a Merc. E63 AMG. This was second on my list, but it's just not as athletic or spirited as the M5. It a beast, but the E class common design just didn't do it for me.
Marchitect is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 07:57   #80
Gustav
Administrator
 
Gustav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kingdom of Sweden
Age: 38

Garage: BMW M3 DCT Sedan / Limousine

Sales Feedback: (0)

Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 5,951
Thanked 3,784 Times in 2,284 Posts
I think BMW presrelease have to been looked into regarding this. What did it exactly state? Also, a safe car would be the Alpina B7, almost as fun.
__________________
Google+ LinkedIn Facebook Flickr

My email gustav@gtboard.com m5board Member visiting Stockholm, Sweden? PM me to and I'll show you Stockholm! gtboard.com
Gustav is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
List: Sultan of Brunei's complete car collection, no M5 but an Alpina Gustav ALPINABoard.com | BMW Alpina Discussion 109 14th September 2007 18:16
Complete BMW M6 Convertible Press Release in English and German (Short Version) Gustav E63 BMW M6 Forum and BMW M6 Convertible | m6board.com 7 23rd June 2006 04:27
BMW M Manager Bruhnke at Stockholm Open, Sweden and answer to your questions Gustav E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 53 12th May 2005 01:51
BMW M Manager Bruhnke at Stockholm Open, Sweden and answer to your questions Gustav E63 BMW M6 Forum and BMW M6 Convertible | m6board.com 51 25th March 2005 17:14
BMW M Manager Bruhnke at Stockholm Open, Sweden and answer to your questions Gustav E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 11 30th October 2004 14:36

Loading...

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:06.



Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.