Buh Bye BMW? 2008 M5 Order Canceled. [Safety concerns after IIHS test results] - Page 7 - BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums

Go Back   BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums > General Forums > Off Topic Forum

Off Topic Forum This is the place for mature discussions not necessarily related to cars. This is however also moderated and only registered members are allowed to post. No religion and no vicious attacks.


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 19th August 2007, 19:33   #61
SOhp101
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA

Garage: 2002 BMW M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's unfair for board members on here to say that the Kia is safer than the 5 series mainly because the safety ratings are used as a comparison with vehicles within the same class/group.

The 5 series crash test ratings is disappointing for the side, but I'm not sure if it would take me off the market for an E60. Other vehicles in this category (aside from A6 and the S80) don't seem to have stellar ratings as well.

http://www.iihs.org/ratings/summary.aspx?class=10

edit: side crash test ratings can be compared across vehicle type/weight categories.

Last edited by SOhp101; 19th August 2007 at 19:39.
SOhp101 is offline  
Old 19th August 2007, 20:02   #62
P-Easy
Member, P400 Sport, DSC On (>550)
 
P-Easy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania
Age: 27

Garage: 2007 Acura TL Type-S

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ View Post
I am still waiting to get a few suggestions for a possible replacement for the E60. I want a four door monster with the drivability that I desire and I am afraid the M5 might be one of the few that meets the demand.

Any comments on the RS4????

MJ
If you are serious about leaving BMW behind, I would deffinatly wait for the RS6. That or get a S6 right now, but I don't think you would be satisfied with anything other than the M5. Mercedes is also another option, pick up a used s65 (unless you can afford new).
__________________
Enjoy every sandwich.
P-Easy is offline  
Old 19th August 2007, 20:41   #63
SLK55R
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California

Garage: SLK55 Renntech Silver

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
MJ

I'd give some suggestions but I don't believe you have given us your requirements. What are you specifically looking for? Does the car have to be 4 doors etc,.

Personally crash tests (while imperfect) shouldn't be taken lightly. I know that after being in an accident it definitely is something that is even more critical. After my wife and son were in a car accident (highway, around 65 mph, 25k in damages) I really liked the FX45. It protected them well and if I needed something like that again, I would seriously consider it.

BTW there are so MANY crappy drivers out there it isn't just about your driving skill.

As to BMW not building a car that would potentially hurt it's occupants ... thats obvious. What might have happened though is that in 1 permutation of a side impact (5 degrees off etc) a part has failed in a way that they weren't aware of. As such, it is now to be considered unsafe, in that instance. This is not about brand loyalty ... if mercedes had the same issue I would honestly have to consider it very carefully.
SLK55R is offline  
Old 19th August 2007, 21:41   #64
shchow
Member, P500 Sport, MDM on (>800)
 
shchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hainesport, New Jersey

Garage: 2014 CTS-V Sedan, Phantom Gray, Manual

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 146
Thanked 72 Times in 53 Posts
The power of any study is the size/number of population sampled and it's reproducibility. From my understanding of this crash test, they studied/crashed ONE car. How powerful or convincing is this experiment? If I were to present a case study of one to try to convince an audience of a point, I'd be laughed of the podium.
The IIHS crash test does not amount more than anecdotal information. It's as valid as someone saying that they had a second cousin's nephew who did this or that...
If anything, there is more cumulative data and experience from existing board members' and their accidents and results. I'd place more credence on the comments of people like Harold who survived a horrific accident than the IIHS study.
__________________
Shih-han

2014 CTS-V-phantom gray, manual
2010 Escalade ESV-black raven

Prior Rides:
2010 CTS-V-black raven, auto
2008 M5-metallic sapphire black, SMG
2007 MB GL450-black
2004 645Ci-metallic sapphire black, sport pack., SMG
1997 Nissan Maxima-black
1989 Honda CRX-white
shchow is offline  
Old 19th August 2007, 21:53   #65
SLK55R
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California

Garage: SLK55 Renntech Silver

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thats silly

You can't use one owner's crash as a benchmark. NO crash is going to be 100% alike. Hopefully that means that this specific test will never be replicated but I'd rather trust that actually crash data.
SLK55R is offline  
Old 19th August 2007, 22:21   #66
shchow
Member, P500 Sport, MDM on (>800)
 
shchow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hainesport, New Jersey

Garage: 2014 CTS-V Sedan, Phantom Gray, Manual

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 146
Thanked 72 Times in 53 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLK55R View Post
You can't use one owner's crash as a benchmark. NO crash is going to be 100% alike. Hopefully that means that this specific test will never be replicated but I'd rather trust that actually crash data.
Did you even read the first half of my post?
My point, the crash test would have more meaning if, say, they sampled 10 identical vehicles and came to the same conclusion a majority of the time. The more vehicles tested, the more accurate the result. I did not say the study was useless (almost useless). If anything, one owner's crash result is probably just as informative as the IIHS study; one car crash. You take the information for what it's worth.
shchow is offline  
Old 19th August 2007, 23:16   #67
BEMR
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
 
BEMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Garage: 2008 M5 ALPINE WHITE

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Anything on the planet can be googled these day of importance regarding safety etc. If it were a real issue since the 5er's been around for a few years, we would have heard about by now, not to mention we could find issues regarding accident safety from consumers that have safety facts findably on the net. Its news spin and sensationalism, why do you think they put the KIA in the same study as a BMW. When I did a search on BMW 5 series side impact accidents, I couldnt find anything other than what came up for IIHS and all the news agencies. It was headlines at abcnews.com. "25k kia may be safer than a 45k bmw" News, studies, wars, safety, all that is spooned fed to us in such a way to sway opinion. Case history and fact, speak louder than an IIHS 5 second test.

Dont believe everything you read, go to an Aljazeera web site in english, and you'll get an entirely different version of the Iraq war. People just want to believe what they read and hear, and are told by others.
__________________
2008 M5 Alpine White w/Portland
2007 335 Alpine White (lilbemr)
BEMR is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 01:08   #68
Wayward
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
Wayward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA

Garage: 2006 M6 - SB/Black

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 46
Thanked 77 Times in 61 Posts
It would appear that most here are of like mind, that is, to assign appropriate weight to these crash tests.

As it relates to the OP, however, it's my belief that MJ is upset by the fact that many did not take his post seriously. I'll be the first to step up here and admit that that was my initial reaction.

My take (as with others, it seems) was that MJ's sheer number of BMW purchases seemed to bely any credence to his original post, but in all fairness, I believe that he should move on and away from BMW.

Many of us value active safety nearly as much as passive safety, however, when transporting one's family, I'm sure we can agree that most of us desire the best of both worlds.

That said, something has to give. The car buying public and manufacturing industry has to balance their purchase and manufacturing decisions with regard to their priorities.

To gain in passive safety, one will forego active safety -- read: performance.

Many here, including myself, did not take MJ's post seriously. For my part, this relates especially given my tendency to over, not underestimate people in general. This trait leads me to "call it as I see it". Please note that this is not in any manner a knock to anyone here.

Perhaps his past purchases were based on style, not performance (but he did not elaborate). The fact that he didn't research crash testing and made assumptions as to 100% (give or take) safety is at this point, is not an issue. (I'm not criticizing nor am I joking here).

In any event, at this point it's quite apparent that MJ is offended by the responses to his discovery and to the responses here. That said, the fact that he has chosen to ignore many of the responses to his post is certainly fine with everyone, I'm sure (fine by me, at least -- the "saving face" aspects of life are important, and we should respect this).

Given this, my contribution to his genuinely posted question would be a very heavy car -- something that would better protect its occupants in the event of a collision.

Perhaps that's the avenue we, as members here, should be pursuing in answer to his request for reccommendations.

Last edited by Wayward; 20th August 2007 at 01:13.
Wayward is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 01:26   #69
M500 AED
Member, P500, DSC On (>600)
 
M500 AED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gloucestershire UK

Garage: E60 M5 in Silverstone II

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 18 Posts
Side impact risks?

Anyone have data as to the percentage of major collisions which are side impacts?

It would help to know in giving a personal weighting to the risks.

The side impacts I have seen have been all of the type where a vehicle pulls out into the path of one crossing at ninety degrees or thereabouts.

Bikers call that a "sorry mate I did not see you event".
(Expletives not included)
__________________
M5 - Weapon of Mass Consumption

Last edited by M500 AED; 20th August 2007 at 01:27.
M500 AED is offline  
Old 20th August 2007, 02:54   #70
MJ
Member, P500 Sport, DSC off (>900)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Florida, USA

Garage: F10 M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
From the IIHS:

"Side impacts are the second most common fatal crash type after frontal crashes. About 9,200 people in passenger vehicles were killed in side impacts in 2005. In crashes with other passenger vehicles during 2004-05, 49 percent of driver deaths in 1-3-year-old cars and minivans occurred in side impacts, up from 31 percent in 1980-81. During the same time, the proportion of driver deaths in frontal crashes declined from 61 to 46 percent."


I am not insulted by some of the responses, just a little surprised. I just can't believe that some people are blowing off a crash test that BMW should have passed with flying colors. It's a far cry from from what the IIHS said in 1997 about the frontal test. Here's a quote my post in 2004:

"When the 1997 E39 5 Series was offset crash tested, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety President Brian O'Neill said that if all cars crashed like the BMW 5 series, they could shut down their testing. Remember, the IIHS is privately funded by insurance companies. The US Government testing done by NHTSA utilizes the full frontal crashes which are not as "real world" as the IIHS offset tests."

Here is the 2004 thread which raises questions about the EURO test also:

Crash Woes for E60 5 Series!!!

The IIHS tests are the BEST thing to happen to auto safety. The institute which is funded by the insurance industry to reduce costs has effectively EMBARRASSED cars companies to make safer cars. The insurance companies pay out less in claims and fewer people die or are maimed. We all win.

I would like to see the IIHS crash a 2004-2007 model to see if the test is the same, since we have no base-line test for the 5 series in a side impact crash. This would show if the design was never good or the 2008 interior door panel redesign is solely the culprit.

Some of the above responses to my original post still don't change my belief that BMW should have ranked in the top tier in this test. THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENT I WAS TRYING TO CONVEY. I was emotionally torqued that something that I thought was a "given" proved not to be. Mattel, the largest toy company in the world, just let parents and kids down with magnets that fall out of Polly Pocket toys and lead paint on some Sesame Street Toys. BMW has also let us down because our expectations are high and we thought a high mark on this test was fundamental for a BMW.

My 2008 M5 order was placed thinking I had the best possible cocoon surrounding me and my family in an unparalleled performance sedan. BMW let me down with last week's results. I still don't take that lightly and you shouldn't either.

MJ
'06 M5 Silver Grey
MJ is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
List: Sultan of Brunei's complete car collection, no M5 but an Alpina Gustav ALPINABoard.com | BMW Alpina Discussion 109 14th September 2007 18:16
Complete BMW M6 Convertible Press Release in English and German (Short Version) Gustav E63 BMW M6 Forum and BMW M6 Convertible | m6board.com 7 23rd June 2006 04:27
BMW M Manager Bruhnke at Stockholm Open, Sweden and answer to your questions Gustav E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 53 12th May 2005 01:51
BMW M Manager Bruhnke at Stockholm Open, Sweden and answer to your questions Gustav E63 BMW M6 Forum and BMW M6 Convertible | m6board.com 51 25th March 2005 17:14
BMW M Manager Bruhnke at Stockholm Open, Sweden and answer to your questions Gustav E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 11 30th October 2004 14:36

Loading...

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 19:04.



Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.