29th June 2012, 21:33
|
#5
|
|
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
|
I have a personal theory on these low residual values for the new M5 and M6.
For the M5, I fear that BMW is doing what Audi has done with the R8. They are basically keeping the Residual values low so that not just anybody can walk in off of the street and lease one for cheap. Audi did this with the R8, but in an even worse way, the R8's residual values were and are still like 44% for a 36 month lease @ 15,000 miles, or something like that. We all know how well built and reliable the R8's turned out to be, so the only thing that makes sense is that Audi kept the Residuals low in order to prevent Joe Schmo middle class american from leasing one. I believe the same thing is now happning with the F10 M5. I have very very very much confidence that the F10 M5 is a much more reliable design than the E60 M5 with it's SMG and Vanos design flaws. Usually Residual Values have to do with confidence in how the product will perform and reliability over the course of the lease term, but as in the case with the Audi R8 and now the F10 M5, the residual value has reflected more of an exclusivity value rather than a reliability value.
As for the M6, it is probably given a higher Residual Value because of the higher base price of the vehicle, which is about $16,000 more in the U.S. Market than a base M5.
We may see the Residual Value for the M5 creep up to what the late model E60 M5's (2009-2010) were, which was about 57%, over the course of the next 5 to 6 years I would guess.
The necessary evil truth of it all is that either way you look at it, it's all an incredible waste of money. LOL!
|
|
|