Why turbos instead of superchargers? - BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums

Go Back   BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums > BMW M5, M5 Touring, M6 and Z8 Forums > F10 M5 Discussion

F10 M5 Discussion 2010- Discussion about the next upcoming generation M5 based on the next generation 5-series, the F10.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12th October 2010, 15:27   #1
Kain
Member, Sport: On DSC: On (>100 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dubai, UAE

Garage: E39 M5...sold!

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Why turbos instead of superchargers?

I don't know all that much about this but isn't the main downside of turbocharging the lag while the main advantage of supercharging is no lag? Why are most car companies that are using FI using turbos instead of superchargers?
Kain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2010, 18:18   #2
imsaid
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EGYPT

Garage: E39 SOLD

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 11
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Turbos are more efficient because they use the exhaust to spin the compressor wheel while superchargers compressor spins via a belt connected to crankshaft which consumes some of the engine's HP.

Last edited by imsaid; 12th October 2010 at 18:19.
imsaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2010, 09:41   #3
Kain
Member, Sport: On DSC: On (>100 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dubai, UAE

Garage: E39 M5...sold!

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Even if turbos are more efficient, isn't the supercharger's consumption of some of the engine's power an "acceptable" trade-off for a lag-less engine response?
Kain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2010, 09:54   #4
imsaid
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EGYPT

Garage: E39 SOLD

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 11
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
With the new technology turbo lag is almost not noticable by most drivers, also turbos consume less fuel which is the main reason companies are switching to turbo charging from NA.

Even Mercedes dumped SC and witched to Turbos with their AMG55 engine.
imsaid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2010, 22:43   #5
blackxs
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
blackxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix AZ

Garage: Z3 M Coupe

Sales Feedback: (2)

Thanks: 646
Thanked 606 Times in 480 Posts
With a supercharger you may not notice any perceptible lag, but you will not be able to achieve the power you want as easily. Superchargers sap power from the engine unlike turbos that use "free" power from the exhaust to feed the engine.

Especially with the reverse-flow architecture of BMW's turbo V engines, turbo lag is essentially something of the past. You feel the throttle response as fast as you would with an N/A and the engine will start making power almost immediately after. This isnt like old times where turbo lag was a fact of life - you would floor it, have a coffee, wait for your turbo to spool, watch a movie, then your turbo is spooled and you are off. With modern technology we have created turbos and engine designs that give you no perceptible turbo lag or throttle delay.

So essentially it comes down to using a S/C which saps power from the engine or a turbo which gets more power and isnt extra load on the engine.
__________________
Unterschrift
blackxs is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to blackxs For This Useful Post:
Hdhntr23 (7th November 2010), M55555 (28th November 2010)
Old 17th October 2010, 04:44   #6
AFC1
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
AFC1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: BOS/Orlando/Palm Beach Gardens
Age: 23

Garage: 2004 M3 Convertible 6 Speed-Silver Gray/Gray

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 259
Thanked 296 Times in 266 Posts
I believe BMW is using turbos in the next M5 purely because of fuel economy reasons. Besides returning better gas mileage, turbos have the disadvantage of turbo lag (still noticeable to me even in modern cars...drive a 335i and E46 M3 back to back and you will see what I mean). Also, turbo engines cannot rev anywhere near as high, while current supercharged M cars (ESS E90 M3 for example) retain their 8400 rpm redlines with the superchargers.

Sure, you can often get more power from an engine by turbocharging it as opposed to supercharging it, but I believe the urge BMW has to use turbos is purely from a fuel economy perspective.



afc1
AFC1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AFC1 For This Useful Post:
Hdhntr23 (7th November 2010)
Old 24th October 2010, 04:04   #7
digger
Fellow Member (>400)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Home

Garage: .

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AFC1 View Post
I believe BMW is using turbos in the next M5 purely because of fuel economy reasons. Besides returning better gas mileage, turbos have the disadvantage of turbo lag (still noticeable to me even in modern cars...drive a 335i and E46 M3 back to back and you will see what I mean). Also, turbo engines cannot rev anywhere near as high, while current supercharged M cars (ESS E90 M3 for example) retain their 8400 rpm redlines with the superchargers.

Sure, you can often get more power from an engine by turbocharging it as opposed to supercharging it, but I believe the urge BMW has to use turbos is purely from a fuel economy perspective.



afc1

turbos are more efficient and will make more power and torque.
Its rubbish that turbo engines can't rev as high. The reason they generally don't is that they don't need to rev high in order to make the power level they need.
digger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th October 2010, 17:58   #8
HeroSina
Member, Sport: On DSC: On (>100 posts)
 
HeroSina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tehran,Iran

Garage: 2008 M6

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 49
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
i agree BMW is using turbos in the next M5 because of economy game,but you will get more power with turbo compared to supercharger.i also should admit turbochargers are not 100% "free" power because turbocharger itself is a obstacle for exhaust gas so engine should work harder to send the gas out of the pipes.
HeroSina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HeroSina For This Useful Post:
Drm5 (22nd November 2010)
Old 25th October 2010, 23:57   #9
blackxs
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
blackxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix AZ

Garage: Z3 M Coupe

Sales Feedback: (2)

Thanks: 646
Thanked 606 Times in 480 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeroSina View Post
i agree BMW is using turbos in the next M5 because of economy game,but you will get more power with turbo compared to supercharger.i also should admit turbochargers are not 100% "free" power because turbocharger itself is a obstacle for exhaust gas so engine should work harder to send the gas out of the pipes.
The engine isnt really working any harder to get rid of the exhaust gas.

Superchargers can not even be compared to turbos in the vein of economy. S/C will drain power from all revs, sapping HP making you get worse MPG. Turbos can sit there not spooled, not being an additional burden on the engine - helping the car seem like a smaller-engined vehicle until you need the power

And seriously, BMW M is not the ones who wanted to go to the TTV8. They were forced to by emissions laws the world over. Dont blame BMW, blame the stupid "Green" activists.
blackxs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2010, 16:05   #10
HeroSina
Member, Sport: On DSC: On (>100 posts)
 
HeroSina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tehran,Iran

Garage: 2008 M6

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 49
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackxs View Post
The engine isnt really working any harder to get rid of the exhaust gas.

Superchargers can not even be compared to turbos in the vein of economy. S/C will drain power from all revs, sapping HP making you get worse MPG. Turbos can sit there not spooled, not being an additional burden on the engine - helping the car seem like a smaller-engined vehicle until you need the power

And seriously, BMW M is not the ones who wanted to go to the TTV8. They were forced to by emissions laws the world over. Dont blame BMW, blame the stupid "Green" activists.
i didn't say Supercharger is better but i still insist on my opinion that MPG gets worse when you force an engine with turbo.for example BMW N53 powerplant uses less gas compared to N55 which has Turbo , and N55 is more advanced.
HeroSina is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opinions on certain superchargers twinturbovenom E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 39 22nd October 2006 21:27
Aftermarket Superchargers milazotes GTBoard.com: General Sportscars 1 10th July 2003 20:50
Koenig superchargers Angel E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 4 31st January 2002 18:50
Superchargers are available! Angel E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 7 22nd January 2002 01:56
Any M3 Superchargers out? M5Laser E90 M3 Sedan, E92 M3 Coupe, E93 M3 Convertible, E46 M3 and E36 M3, Z4 M and Z4 M Coupe 0 23rd November 2001 05:31

Loading...

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:07.



Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.