Go Back   The Unofficial BMW M5 Messageboard (m5board.com) > BMW M5, M5 Touring, M6 and Z8 Forums > E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion

E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 2005- Advertiser's Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 1st April 2005, 02:07   #101
DZeckhausen
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
DZeckhausen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Florham Park, NJ USA

Garage: 2001 540i 6-Speed, Alpine White

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 60 Times in 30 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DZeckhausen
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by bernhtp
Just call me extremely skeptical as .2 sec is a relative eternity. If my brakes took nearly that long between press and actuation, I would feel it and immediately take it in for service. This also assumes that the Brembo times were zero.
It's good to be skeptical.

This does not assume the Brembo times to be zero. It is based on observing the change in the velocity graphs of cars with stock brakes and that same car, same driver, same track, same day with StopTech brakes. The shape of the velocity vs time curve is different at the transition from not braking at all to the linear range. To get an accurate measurement of the improvement in reaction time requires a telemetry device with a switch connected to the brake pedal, a bunch of accelerometers and changes to the software on the laptop connected to the radar gun. So stuff has to be purchased, software has to be written, and techniques have to be baselined. All of this will take some time and money.

The improvement is visible graphically. To get a hard and fast number will require the new test set-up. And the improvement will obviously vary from car to car. An STi with factory Brembos (or 350Z Track Model) may show zero reaction time improvement and a Ford Taurus may show an enourmous improvement.

An additional benefit of the new test fixture is the ability to prove (or disprove) the theory that stainless braided teflon lines also improve reaction time and thus shorten braking distance in a panic stop. If they do, then one might also assume the bronze calliper bushings from www.bimmerword.com and www.turnermotorsport.com will have similar impact. I'm impatiently waiting to find out.

If you think 0.2 seconds is an eternity, then how long do you think it takes from when the driver turns the steering wheel to X degrees that the car stabilizes in the new direction?
__________________
Dave Zeckhausen
Owner, Zeckhausen Racing

2001 540i 6-Speed
StopTech 4-wheel big brake upgrade (ST-60 front/ST22 rear)
M5 3.15 Limited Slip Differential
M5 Front Swaybar
Dinan Stage 3 Suspension
Dinan Front Strut Tower Brace
Rogue Octane Short Shifter & Transmission Mounts
European Dash Conversion
CDV Deleted (of course!)
Bluetooth, NAV-TV, DVD Player


2006 Chrysler 300C SRT8 w/StopTech ST-60 front/ST-40 rear BBK
2007 Corvette Z51 Coupe 6-Speed w/StopTech Trophy ST-60 front/ST-40 rear
2009 Honda Fit Sport w/NAV w/Acura Integra front calipers, StopTech floating rotors on order
DZeckhausen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2005, 02:19   #102
Enigma
Member, P500 Sport, DSC On (>700)
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sunnyvale, CA

Garage: E46 M3 IR/IR SMG II

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by DZeckhausen
If you think 0.2 seconds is an eternity, then how long do you think it takes from when the driver turns the steering wheel to X degrees that the car stabilizes in the new direction?
Hehe, that will depend on the shocks, springs, tires, sway bars, ....

I would not be surprised to see a number close to 1s for a stock M car.
__________________
HP wins races, if you know how to drive and shift. Torque is for old men driving around town pretending.

The clutch pedal is a throwback to the days of carburation and OHV engines. It has served us well but its time to let go and embrace the future.
Enigma is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2005, 02:26   #103
bernhtp
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin area, TX USA

Garage: M6 Convertible - Saphire Black, Portland Brown full merino, CF

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 5
Thanked 174 Times in 118 Posts
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

I assumed the zero Brembo times for simplification purposes. Any amount above that must be added to the stock brake response time to get the .2 sec difference.

Changing the direction of a car and then stabilizing the suspension thereafter is a completely different subject and has to do with both the steering system and the suspension, particularly the latter.

Tom

Last edited by bernhtp; 1st April 2005 at 02:27.
bernhtp is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2005, 02:27   #104
DZeckhausen
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
DZeckhausen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Florham Park, NJ USA

Garage: 2001 540i 6-Speed, Alpine White

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 60 Times in 30 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DZeckhausen
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma
Hehe, that will depend on the shocks, springs, tires, sway bars, ....

I would not be surprised to see a number close to 1s for a stock M car.
Close! Very good. But try doubling that number. I was in a class on Friday that covered suspension dynamics and one of the sections illustrated that topic. More than one of us was skeptical. (There's that word again!) The steps involved were broken down for us and then illustrated for us with a CarSim video, using a "real" car. I think it was a VW Golf GTi in this example.

Last edited by DZeckhausen; 1st April 2005 at 02:27.
DZeckhausen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2005, 05:04   #105
Jessem
Member, P500, DSC On (>600)
 
Jessem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Phoenixville, PA

Garage: 06 M5, Sapphire Black

Sales Feedback: (1)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

The issue here is how the brake system works. Based on a lot of heresay so far we have evaluations ranging all over the map about the effectiveness of the M5 brakes. Why are we debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin when we haven't seen the subject of the debate.

I'm sure that the brakes could be improved. Does anyone here think that no one with a porsche ever upgrades their brakes? I'd guess that the whole discussion would go away if the factory had put nice red brembos inside the wheels.

As I would assume Dave would aggree, the whole system must be upgraded to get the better braking he describes, from brake lines to proper calipers, pads, preload of the pads when the throttle snaps shut, and perhaps even different disks. I said different since I wouldn't assume larger is the right answer.

Lastly, Infinity had an option on the G35 coupe of Brembos as part of the sport package. Funny, but the stock brakes stopped in the same distance! Were they there for cosmetics and customer appeal? or for real improvement? Hmmm...

Should BMW charge more for brakes that only a few of us would appreciate? Then what would be diddle with on our cars? Oh, and as much as I love my M5, it's not an exotic.
__________________
JesseM
[b]2006 M5 Sapphire Black,Indi red, HUD, rear bags, fold seats, comfort access, BBS RG-Rs,275/35 -285/35, Dinan front & rear roll control 56K Miles, still getting 1200 miles per liter TWS

2003 Silver 325XiT
2003 Black Infiniti G35 Coupe
2005 BMW K12S(<8min N'ring)
Vintage Triumph m/c's(110 rwhp/liter -w/pushrods)
Jessem is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2005, 16:40   #106
DZeckhausen
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
DZeckhausen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Florham Park, NJ USA

Garage: 2001 540i 6-Speed, Alpine White

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 60 Times in 30 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DZeckhausen
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessem
...preload of the pads when the throttle snaps shut...
That seems like a really clever idea. I'll have to ask my contact at Delphi if this is a strategy being considered (or already implemented) to improve reaction time in conjunction with "brake assist." At the class on Friday, we discussed the sensors used to measure brake pedal position and differentiate between a normal hard stop and a panic stop. The position vs time charts were radically different, which explains why most people helped by "brake assist" are never aware that it happened. If you could do something similar by observing a related unique characteristic to the way the gas pedal is released prior to a panic stop, you could start to apply brake pressure to remove compiance from the system in preperation for a panic stop even before the driver touches the brake pedal. The kicker will be if there is a high false alarm rate.

Did you think this up yourself or did you read somewhere that this is actually being done or in the works? Either way, thanks for mentioning it!
DZeckhausen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2005, 17:24   #107
steve999
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne

Garage: E55, F550 330

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessem
The issue here is how the brake system works. Based on a lot of heresay so far we have evaluations ranging all over the map about the effectiveness of the M5 brakes. Why are we debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin when we haven't seen the subject of the debate.

I'm sure that the brakes could be improved. Does anyone here think that no one with a porsche ever upgrades their brakes? I'd guess that the whole discussion would go away if the factory had put nice red brembos inside the wheels.

As I would assume Dave would aggree, the whole system must be upgraded to get the better braking he describes, from brake lines to proper calipers, pads, preload of the pads when the throttle snaps shut, and perhaps even different disks. I said different since I wouldn't assume larger is the right answer.

Lastly, Infinity had an option on the G35 coupe of Brembos as part of the sport package. Funny, but the stock brakes stopped in the same distance! Were they there for cosmetics and customer appeal? or for real improvement? Hmmm...

Should BMW charge more for brakes that only a few of us would appreciate? Then what would be diddle with on our cars? Oh, and as much as I love my M5, it's not an exotic.
Interesting comment and very similar to many here already. Must remember this when seeing discussion next time about the relative merits of M cars and AMG's. The fact that people here don't seem to have a rudimentry understanding of brakes and their limitations, demonstrates that many M drivers are just boulavard cruisers, who would probably be better off in an AMG, for the usage their cars get.
steve999 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2005, 23:36   #108
steve999
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne

Garage: E55, F550 330

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by DZeckhausen
At the class on Friday, we discussed the sensors used to measure brake pedal position and differentiate between a normal hard stop and a panic stop. The position vs time charts were radically different, which explains why most people helped by "brake assist" are never aware that it happened. If you could do something similar by observing a related unique characteristic to the way the gas pedal is released prior to a panic stop, you could start to apply brake pressure to remove compiance from the system in preperation for a panic stop even before the driver touches the brake pedal. The kicker will be if there is a high false alarm rate.
Recently on the freeway in my MB S class with the whole pre safe thingy, I had to brake suddenly and hard for about two seconds for an idiot driver swapping out of a much slower moving lane near an offramp. The car decided that there was an emergency situation and continued braking for another 2 seconds AFTER I had already removed my foot from the brake pedal entirely. (it also starts closing sunroom, moving seats more upright etc in preparation for a potential impact)
steve999 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2005, 23:53   #109
DZeckhausen
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
DZeckhausen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Florham Park, NJ USA

Garage: 2001 540i 6-Speed, Alpine White

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 60 Times in 30 Posts
Send a message via AIM to DZeckhausen
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve999
Recently on the freeway in my MB S class with the whole pre safe thingy, I had to brake suddenly and hard for about two seconds for an idiot driver swapping out of a much slower moving lane near an offramp. The car decided that there was an emergency situation and continued braking for another 2 seconds AFTER I had already removed my foot from the brake pedal entirely. (it also starts closing sunroom, moving seats more upright etc in preparation for a potential impact)
The Delphi systems don't continue braking after the driver lifts his foot off the brake pedal. But it does continue at full force if the driver lifts partially. It's characteristic of drivers in panic stops to initially spike the brake pedal and then lift off when they should stay on it full. The reduction in stopping distance in a panic stop with brake assist is amazing.

In your case, it clearly did more than you wanted it to. I wonder if Mercedes is much more agressive than other manufacturers with this system. Curious what would have happened in the Corvette C6 in the same situation.
DZeckhausen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2005, 00:08   #110
Maggo
Member, Sport: On DSC: On (>100 posts)
 
Maggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 36

Garage: M5 E39 (black), 635 CSi (white)

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Maggo
Re: M5's "poor" brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve999
The car decided that there was an emergency situation and continued braking for another 2 seconds AFTER I had already removed my foot from the brake pedal entirely. (it also starts closing sunroom, moving seats more upright etc in preparation for a potential impact)
I developped the Brake Assistant of the E46.
I dont know the system of the S-class, but that afterbraking effect is a problem is a common problem.
Mostly you have afterbraking for about 100ms, but the river feels it as a second.
__________________
Maggo
1999 Carbonblack/Black M5
1987 Alpinewhite/Cardinalred 635CSi
http://www.my635.com
Maggo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Euro spec brakes steve adams E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 20 24th May 2002 14:58
Stop tech big brakes for sale! (Cheap) Rave E55 For Sale or Wanted 2 12th May 2002 04:08
Next project! - New brakes but have some questions atomic80 E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 9 16th April 2002 23:29
M5 brakes - oustanding; fatal accident on hwy85 yesterday.... Jacob Lee E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 35 22nd March 2002 16:01
BBS maybe able to build me an 18 inch track wheel to fit over my Movit 380mm brakes?? Apples E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 3 3rd March 2002 01:59

Loading...
eXTReMe Tracker

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:27.


Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.
Page generated in 0.20253 seconds with 11 queries