The Answer to SMG vs. 6-speed - BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums

Go Back   BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums > BMW M5, M5 Touring, M6 and Z8 Forums > E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion

E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 2005- Advertiser's Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 3.75 average. Display Modes
Old 13th February 2003, 05:43   #1
Yupkwondo
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
 
Yupkwondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Medina, OH, USA
Age: 31

Garage: 2001 M5 Lemans/Lemans

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Answer to SMG vs. 6-speed

After all this SMG, 6-Speed debate...what would be the possibility of a transmission that could do both. I know it's not in development,(well as far as I know) but if you thought about it, I don't see how hard it could really be. (Take that in terms of what they have accomplished already, it's way to hard for someone like me to develop)...Anyway, as I see it, one would need a dual cylinder clutch, one for the pedal, and one for the SMG. The computer could control which one works when, through a pressure release valve, that switches to whatever one needs the pressure at that time. And you would need a way to change from a stick control, to servo activated gear changes. Again, I'm sure there is a way to do this. A "7th gear" where you put it and the servos/pneumatic valves that do the actual gear changes start to work. I think that would be the ultimate way to progress, the two in one possibility of full manual control, and true race inspired SMG!!

Or, as another way to develop the system, you could have a manual/stick that is drive by wire. As you move the stick the computer uses sensors, to control the transmission through already controlled means that a SMG has. SMG already has different speed controls, and the car has enough computing power to know/learn how to work the clutch with a variable input, not just given parameters. Using this method there wouldn't have to be a way to switch from true manual to SMG manual, it would all be SMG components with even more User interface.

Or it could then have a "button clutch," full clutch movement, and feel however the computer would again sense position and react in the way it needs to. So if the processor does 1000 positions per second, there would be no way to know what was controlling your clutch activation. Then when you goto true SMG mode (again the "7th Gear") you goto the fully auto paddles on the wheel,and the 5ms shifts, or what have you.

If I had the development money, I would truly pursue this idea, as I feel that it would be an enthusiast dream, well as long as they aren't a purist and an enthusiast!!

~ Jason
2001 Lemans/Lemans
Yupkwondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2003, 22:47   #2
Tom C
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
 
Tom C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Maryland, USA
Age: 41

Garage: '02 M5 LMB (gone), '13 M5, '12 RR Evoque

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 106
Thanked 145 Times in 103 Posts
Jason:

How about a hybrid of your drive-by-wire idea:

The clutch pedal itself is clutch-by-wire technology. The clutch is actuated by the clutch pedal but not by cable...but by electronic sensors connected to the clutch pedal. The car could have a standard/default setting of the manual transmission. Then you could have a switch where you could go to a fully electronic automatic. Once the auto is engaged, the electronics could control the clutch itself by sensor readings on the throttle. You would probably have to electronic control the stick shift itself too....where you are banging it around but not actually "shifting" into each gear in the manual setting.

Just a thought (maybe a deeply disturbed one at that)

Tom
Tom C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2003, 02:02   #3
Enigma
Member, P500 Sport, DSC On (>700)
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sunnyvale, CA

Garage: E46 M3 IR/IR SMG II

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why add all this complication to a system that already performs better than the human can just to give them more work to do?
Enigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2003, 05:40   #4
alpinadvl
Moderator Emeritus
 
alpinadvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: California, New York, Germany

Garage: Alpina B12 5.7, couple of 911s, and the coolest audis on the planet ! :)

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 4
Thanked 23 Times in 11 Posts
RUF has already developed a clutchless 6-speed...... this may be of interest to you.
__________________
====| A L P I N A B125.7 C L U B |====

---> MY Alpina B10 3.5 US Conv SOLD / EXTERIOR PICS / INTERIOR PICS
alpinadvl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2003, 13:28   #5
MEnthusiast
Moderator Emeritus
 
MEnthusiast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Coast, USA

Garage: 03 M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 55
Thanked 47 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Enigma
Why add all this complication to a system that already performs better than the human can just to give them more work to do?
well, I think there is the "fun factor". for example, to take your statement to the extreme, why even have cars that we drive? Computers now could drive the cars much better. we have radar cruise control, systems that self park cars, etc.... or why not have cars that are manufacturer limited to the speed limit? Im sure it would save lives and fuel.....

I think the ideas for a dual traditional/smg system are very interesting. Id be in favor of it if it didnt affect performance.
__________________
All the best,
Jerry
00 Z8 Jet Black/Red Sport / some others

Last edited by MEnthusiast; 14th February 2003 at 13:29.
MEnthusiast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th February 2003, 18:31   #6
Z8Bob
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
Z8Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SoCal

Garage: 2000 Z8 Silver/Red - 2003 M5 SG/Caramel

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

I think the idea is very creative. The Throttle is already a wire system, and MB uses it for braking on the SL (some early mixed results) so why not the shifter and the clutch...

I sent the string on the BMWNA managers
__________________
Z8 Bob
2003 Z8 Ti Silver/Sport Red
2006 M5 Silver Gray/Indi Red
Z8Bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2003, 15:28   #7
MAVERICK
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
MAVERICK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH, USA

Garage: X

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I volunteer to be BMW's test driver for this proposed new system

Jason, what made you think of this innovative idea?

Shifting (no pun intended) from a 6-speed manual to an SMG at the touch of a button and testing this system all day long would be a nice task.

Skeptic question: Mercedes has done a lousy job with their fly-by-wire braking in terms of feel and modulation ( not to mention stopping distance -- C&D W211 E55 roadtest). So if BMW were to go electronic with the clutch, how would a driver sense the biting/engagement of the clutch through her foot? Could we get used to having no engagement feel in the clutch?

Another question: With present manual gearboxes we, purists, have complete mechanical control over the car's clutch and gearbox. Suppose the electronic accelerator goes berserk, we can always take the car out of gear and coast in neutral. If we allow the accelerator, brake, clutch, gear lever, and steering (Active Steering) all be controlled by "I-drive-you-don't" computer, will we be truly happy or simply muttering under our breath about the good ol' days?

Any experienced pilots out there who can compare and contrast the feel of flying fly-by-cable versus fly-by-wire commercial/military aircrafts?
__________________
"Friends don't let friends drive automatics!" -- Alpinadvl
MAVERICK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2003, 15:58   #8
MEnthusiast
Moderator Emeritus
 
MEnthusiast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Coast, USA

Garage: 03 M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 55
Thanked 47 Times in 33 Posts
I think those are great questions. Ive heard that the MB brake by wire system is getting mixed reviews and also is somewhat problematic. Im sure they will get it right in the next year or two.

My opinion is that BMW generally does things the right way and if they could do a system that Jason suggested and we think is a good idea, I have faith that they would impliment it in a way where it has the proper feel. maybe it would take them 5 years to get it right, but I think they would in the end.

as to safety- lets face it, what happens if the steering system fails us right now? I know someone who had something like this occur while he was on the highway!!! Hes uninjured, but that was very scarey.
MEnthusiast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th February 2003, 19:23   #9
ajsd
Member
 
ajsd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London

Garage: E39 M5 Le Mans Blue

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What Jason suggest should be fairly straightforward for a manufacturer to develop. When semi-automatic gearboxes were first introduced in Formula 1 by Ferrari and then by Williams the drivers still had a normal foot operated hydraulic clutch for starting and the eletronics only took over clutch control on the move. Adapting the system for road use and getting automated clutch control to work properly from a rest is the biggest challenge for getting a SMG type system to work in a road car. Having a system where the driver could elect to disable automatic clutch control and use a foot pedal but shift the gears through either paddles or sequential stick should be fairly simple to engineer. It would be great for city driving (a would save lots of warranty costs for manufacturers for burnt out clutches). I have the misfortune of having to slog through London tarffic on the way to work every day and it is painful to be in traffic near a Ferrari 355 or 360 F1 or an Aston Vanquish and listen to the clutch slip that's programmed into the system to allow them to deal with slow moving traffic.
ajsd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2003, 00:08   #10
Enigma
Member, P500 Sport, DSC On (>700)
 
Enigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sunnyvale, CA

Garage: E46 M3 IR/IR SMG II

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am sorry to say it but this is a dumb idea. The pureist drivers that want the clutch pedal and gearshift the way it is right now will find somethign to had about anything with added electronics just as they always do.

The SMG camp will see having a pedal that they never use as stupid. Also making an smg like shifter is a bad idea. Push forward for down and back for up is much simpler than an H pattern while on the track...
Enigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SMG over Std. Man. is like Windows over DOS Dirim E90 M3 Sedan, E92 M3 Coupe, E93 M3 Convertible, E46 M3 and E36 M3, Z4 M and Z4 M Coupe 12 29th June 2006 18:21
An in-depth SMG II review (LONG) kenneth E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 17 10th March 2004 00:31
Answer to the 6-speed, Auto, SMG debate?!?!... Yupkwondo E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 7 17th February 2003 19:34
definition of a speed trap... Jacob Lee E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 1 7th February 2002 01:59
SMG Press Release Omar E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 12 18th February 2001 22:45

Loading...

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:09.



Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.