6th December 2012, 18:10
|
#10
|
|
Addicted Member (>300 posts)
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Garage:
2008 M5, 2010 X5
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRacerBoss
If I am not wrong, I remember seeing a video with two M5's all stock, except one had lighter 20 inch wheels and the other had stock. Though the light 20 inch wheel car takes off a tad bit faster and by that a mean a 2 feet lead, the stock wheel car surpasses it, by about a good 4 feet when both the cars are doing 3 digits.
That goes to say that the OEM's are the way they are for a reason.
The video cant be used as conclusive evidence but what I mean is the change in weight is not going to matter big time unless your racing.
One should understand difference between wheel weight and wheel mass. Its the mass of the wheel that changes the proportion of Un-sprung weight. Watch the HRE videos for further clarification on wheel weight and wheel mass.
|
Seen the videos from HRE. Understand weight vs mass vs location of the mass, etc. You are making some assumptions there and only really focusing on straight line speed. What was the wheel weight of the 20s in the video? Some 20" wheels weight nearly 40lbs each. Did one car have a full tank, did one car have a crappy driver? I would say the only way to test straight line speed is same car, same day/temp, same fuel load, same everything except the wheels. And that still wouldn't provide any insight into how fast you would get around a road course.
I can say that I am more impressed with the overall feel of the car. Car just feels more nimble. Maybe it is in my head, but I sure do like it. I also feel like I don't have to worry so much about road imperfections. That is not to say that the 21" Rads wont go back on the car. The jury is still out. The Rads are definitely one of the best looking wheels out there imho.
One thing I can say is that the OEM 19" wheels could be improved if they were forged and lighter. There can be little argument there.
|
|
|