Quote:
|
Originally Posted by EWade15
Mark,
My raw numbers displayed were 106-107 with old MAFs. After replacing them, I saw 108 - 112.5 and figured that the variation was the DME adjusting. I might just drive over the hill Monday to Sacramento (25 ft elev.) and check my numbers. It sounds like our numbers were indeed similar before I replaced the MAFs. Have you replaced yours recently?
Eric
|
Eric & Mark,
We donŽt have very much data from high altitude, so yours is especially appreciated. If you have some environmental data too (temp, barometric pressure, altitude, humidity) it makes the data even more useful.
BTW, I can imagine the dialogue going on:
Husband to Spouse:
Darling, I need to drive an errand. Just to check if the car gets stronger with
lower altitude, so IŽll drive to the Pacific and back, just to check if the fuel flow numbers gett any better. IŽll be collecting Data, all for Science, you know. See you in a couple of days, hon!
Spouse:
Have fun! IŽll spend those days power-shopping!
David