|
30th June 2002, 23:05
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Orlando FL & Australia
Age: 37
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 15 Posts
|
Used the G-Tec today.... 1st 1/4 mile run got 13.7 @116mph...
Well after getting some new fuses, as the other one blew l thought l may as well give the G Tec a wirl.
Not a good day for testing, as it was bloody hot and humid don't ya love Florida, but it's my virgin test so who cares.
I first did the HP test and only managed to find about 350hp????,so l don't know whats up with that reading as l'm 100% sure it was set right or close enough.....4200lbs and G Tec set flat at 00 reading.
I only did a coulple of HP runs as l didn't want to fry the clutch.
I then did the 1/4 mile test and first up l got a 13.7 sec pass @ 116mph
good trap speed but l must have been a bit slow in the lower RPM's in first???
I tried a few more 1/4 mile times but l think it was getting a bit too hot for her and the extra ones were around 110mph and around 14.5 sec.
So is that trap speed 116 mph good...l think it's good for the conditions ???? and the 13.7 sec about normal??? Whatya think 1/4 mile experts.
I look forward to trying again later in the year with better conditions.
APPLES
__________________
2000 M5 LeMans blue
Headers/cats/exhaust/KW suspension/sway bars/UUC shifter/UUC clutch/BBS LM 19's.
2003 M5...actually MIB's (master yoda)
2004 Lamborghini Gallardo Pearl Yellow. HRE 840r 19's front 20's rear
2006 Ford GT Heritage blue
www.m5ute.com
|
|
|
30th June 2002, 23:39
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Kingdom of Sweden
Age: 32
Posts: 31,828
Thanks: 687
Thanked 830 Times in 448 Posts
|
For a G Tech it definetly should be low 13s. I got 13,3-13.4 on my M3 3,2 with 321 HP. Although it was very cold then.
Best timeslip here is RaMsEs with a time of 12,9 or so I think.
|
|
|
1st July 2002, 01:46
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK
Age: 29
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Apples,
Like I told you earlier, 116mph is pretty good, I think if the weather is right (40-50degrees and low humidity) you might be able to get 117 or 118 out of her. As far as time goes, I think in those ideal condtions, with traps speeds like that, you should be able to get low 12's out of her (good traction a must). Mid 12's should come with ease, if you do a small burnout on your street tires, just heat em' up a little.....
I tried to organize a track night a while back, but it fell through. When the winter comes around we should put a bunch of nuts together and storm the drag strip.....It would be pretty cool to compare cars in real life driving conditions, not just on a dyno.........
__________________
Mike
2001 Z8 BLACK/RED K&N FILTERS POWERCHIP ECU UPGRADE (Thanks Apples)
365RWHP
350RWTQ
Sold, please take care of her
2001 X5 4.4 SPORT BLACK/BLACK K&N FILTER.
M3 Come.. M3 Go
|
|
|
1st July 2002, 04:36
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 204
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Apples:
116 mph sounds very good. But be carefull, G-tech are known to be imprecise. Personally, I recommend and use AP22 from www.race-technology.com, it is more consistent and gives you more information.
By the way if you want to convert your MPH into HP use following formula:
HP = ((MPH x 0.00426)*3) x Weight
so in your case 116 x 0.00426 = 0.4942, cubed it is 0.121 times 4200, your HP is 507 at the flywheel.
Judging from your dyno of 408HP at the wheels, your flywheel HP at 15% loss should be 480HP.
Pretty close.
|
|
|
1st July 2002, 06:40
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The GTech finishing speed, and a track trap speed are two different things. At a track, you pass by two markers (spced apart obviouslly) at the end of the track, and based on the time taken to cover this distance, your trap speed is calculated. So at the track, it is not the speed you're finishing the 1/4 mile with, but rather an average of the last X ft. (I forgot the exact distance).. The Gtech, calculates your speed once at the end of the run, so it will obviouslly be a tad higher..
gee I hope that made at least a little sense
|
|
|
1st July 2002, 06:44
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally posted by 2001's X5/Z8
if you do a small burnout on your street tires, just heat em' up a little.....
|
There's absolutely no benefit in doing a burn out in street radials. Slicks, yes, but slicks are made of an entirely different compound, in which a burnout is necessary to bring the sticky residue (I'm not up on the lingo) to the tires surface..
|
|
|
1st July 2002, 06:51
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK
Age: 29
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally posted by IloveM5s
There's absolutely no benefit in doing a burn out in street radials. Slicks, yes, but slicks are made of an entirely different compound, in which a burnout is necessary to bring the sticky residue (I'm not up on the lingo) to the tires surface..
|
I thouroughly disagree, and so do the laws of physics.
The higher the tempature of any piece rubber, the softer it becomes. Therefore, doing a burnout on ANY type of tire increases that tires ability to maintain traction....That is an irrefutable and undisputable fact
__________________
Mike
2001 Z8 BLACK/RED K&N FILTERS POWERCHIP ECU UPGRADE (Thanks Apples)
365RWHP
350RWTQ
Sold, please take care of her
2001 X5 4.4 SPORT BLACK/BLACK K&N FILTER.
M3 Come.. M3 Go
Last edited by 2001's X5/Z8; 1st July 2002 at 07:11.
|
|
|
1st July 2002, 07:32
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 55
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'm lost, the last time i read the forums at this site was about october of 2001. I remember Apples talking about picking a license plate for his new Nowack M5. Did something go wrong dude  I thought you were going to have like 517 hp at the flyweel  Could someone fill me in
|
|
|
1st July 2002, 07:50
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,664
Thanks: 10
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
Great trap speed so far Apples.
|
|
|
1st July 2002, 08:17
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 29
Posts: 5,151
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
trap speed sounds good, but the time may be a bit low... but then again, I wouldn't trust g-techs for they are known to be inaccurate...
__________________
US Spec 2001 E39 M5 - LHD
AC Schnitzer
DFC suspension, anti-sway bars, pedals
front splitters, rear wing w/ carbon fiber
Dinan
CAI, MAFS, Throttle bodies, Velocity Stacks,
Stage 2 aluminum flywheel, front + rear strut bars,
3.45 differential
Others
Custom G-power Exhaust, Autosolutions short shifter
Supersprint Headers, Racing Cats, X-pipe
SPEC stage 3 clutch, Powerchip ECU, Schrick Cams
OZ Racing Superleggera III f19x8.5 r19x10.5, Brembo brakes
Evosport Power Pullies, Rouge transmission mounts, Plasma ignition coils
Euro interior conversion, M-technic grill with brake ducts, turbo timer
CA Automative custom carbon fiber hood
Euro Spec 1999 E39 M5 - RHD
ACS Sports Suspension, anti-sway bars, Type III Racing f19x8.5 r19x9.5
2007 Mercedes E63
2007 Corvette Z06
2008 Nissan GTR
|
|
|
| |