Those with SS Headers: Ground Clearance - Page 7 - BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums

Go Back   BMW M5 Forum and M6 Forums > BMW M5, M5 Touring, M6 and Z8 Forums > E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion

E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 1998-2003 Advertiser's Forum

Like Tree2Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 5th October 2010, 05:55   #61
havasusteve03Beast
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
havasusteve03Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA US of A
Age: 52

Garage: 2003 E39 M5 TiSi w/ Silverstone interior & 12 Cadillac CTS-V Sedan

Sales Feedback: (50)

Thanks: 1,629
Thanked 973 Times in 589 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by firehire View Post
You're such a "giver". BTW, your Bears stunk up the joint.
Hater

Quote:
Originally Posted by M55555 View Post
I wish I had THIS problem.
Well....
havasusteve03Beast is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to havasusteve03Beast For This Useful Post:
M55555 (11th October 2010)
Old 11th October 2010, 06:21   #62
Burden
Junior Member, warming up (<31 posts)
 
Burden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX

Garage: Carbon Black M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Lower Passenger Side Collector

Thank you everyone for the information. I have been pondering the same issue for quite some time. However, I too seem to have a lower passenger side collector than the driver side. From a glance it looks like it could be a quarter to half inch or so. I will get an official measurement once she cools off.

From my understanding, both pipes would be lower if the engine or gearbox mounts were starting to wear, correct? Therefore, is the most likely candidate installation error?

Also, as a side note, how many of you decided to coat the SS headers? I was really debating it, and am now starting to see some surface rust on the pipes. I hope I won't regret my decision in a few years.

Thanks a bunch for the help!

Best,
Burden

P.S. This board has been a ton of help over the past few years. Thank you very much for putting together such a terrific resource for our cars and gathering an amazing set of enthusiasts!
Burden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Burden For This Useful Post:
M55555 (11th October 2010)
Old 11th October 2010, 08:38   #63
M55555
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
M55555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: California

Garage: 2001 Carbon Black M5

Sales Feedback: (10)

Thanks: 2,568
Thanked 950 Times in 736 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burden View Post
From my understanding, both pipes would be lower if the engine or gearbox mounts were starting to wear, correct? Therefore, is the most likely candidate installation error?

Also, as a side note, how many of you decided to coat the SS headers? I was really debating it, and am now starting to see some surface rust on the pipes. I hope I won't regret my decision in a few years.
Hey Burden-

I opted to not coat my headers, but I did spray the collector with high temp matte black paint. If you notice areas of rust, I would attempt to clean the rust as best as you can, and spray with some high temp paint to aide in rust prevention.

I'm planning to stop by my shop this week and see what their thoughts are about replacing my engine mounts in hopes of the collector being positioned in the way SS originally built them. I cannot say whether your instance is installation error, but I'm not sure if engine mounts can wear only on one side causing only one side to be lower than the other.
__________________
2001 Carbon Black ///M5
Supersprint 4-1 Headers
Magnaflow 10416 Resonators
Timmay77 Signature Muffler Delete
Custom Software Tune
Bilstein PSS9 Coilovers
Ground Control Camber Plates
BBS CH in Custom Satin Black
Hankook Ventus V12 255/35/19, 275/30/19
Wheel Stud-Conversion Kit F/R
15mm Front + 5mm Rear Spacers
E60 545i SSK + UUC DSSR + ZHP Knob
SLIMM C63 AMG Style Diffuser V1
SLIMM Front Splitters
SLIMM 3.5" Fog Light Air Ducts
SLIMM OEM Euro Armrest
M55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2010, 15:39   #64
havasusteve03Beast
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
havasusteve03Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA US of A
Age: 52

Garage: 2003 E39 M5 TiSi w/ Silverstone interior & 12 Cadillac CTS-V Sedan

Sales Feedback: (50)

Thanks: 1,629
Thanked 973 Times in 589 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by M55555 View Post
Hey Burden-

I opted to not coat my headers, but I did spray the collector with high temp matte black paint. If you notice areas of rust, I would attempt to clean the rust as best as you can, and spray with some high temp paint to aide in rust prevention.

I'm planning to stop by my shop this week and see what their thoughts are about replacing my engine mounts in hopes of the collector being positioned in the way SS originally built them. I cannot say whether your instance is installation error, but I'm not sure if engine mounts can wear only on one side causing only one side to be lower than the other.
I dont have mine coated either. Being stainless, I didnt feel the need. With regards to installation error, the only error could be at the collector and how far up on the header tubes it slides. The last retrofit/gasket replacement I was present and can attest that there is identical spacing at the expansion joint on the individual header pipes for both sides and I personally still have the slight passenger side drop.
havasusteve03Beast is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2010, 21:24   #65
M55555
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
M55555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: California

Garage: 2001 Carbon Black M5

Sales Feedback: (10)

Thanks: 2,568
Thanked 950 Times in 736 Posts
Hi Steve - have you changed out your engine mounts yet? I think I'm having mine done this week..
M55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2010, 00:24   #66
M55555
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
M55555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: California

Garage: 2001 Carbon Black M5

Sales Feedback: (10)

Thanks: 2,568
Thanked 950 Times in 736 Posts
My indy indicated that both my motor mounts have "collapsed" and he recommend replacing them. He quoted me $320 out the door. Will update once its done tomorrow in hopes it improves ground clearance.

PS: I am at 67k miles.

Last edited by M55555; 16th November 2010 at 00:25.
M55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2010, 05:49   #67
havasusteve03Beast
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
havasusteve03Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA US of A
Age: 52

Garage: 2003 E39 M5 TiSi w/ Silverstone interior & 12 Cadillac CTS-V Sedan

Sales Feedback: (50)

Thanks: 1,629
Thanked 973 Times in 589 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by M55555 View Post
My indy indicated that both my motor mounts have "collapsed" and he recommend replacing them. He quoted me $320 out the door. Will update once its done tomorrow in hopes it improves ground clearance.

PS: I am at 67k miles.
Sorry about the delay. Havent had the motor mounts done yet. I am changing out the trans mounts on Thursday and will report back

I should probably have my Indy look at the mounts to see what he thinks.

P.S. See if you can do before and after measuremenys and I will do the same!!

Steve
__________________
Titanium Silver w/ Silverstone Extended Leather Interior & Di-Noc wrap; Vorsteiner Double-sided CF vented hood; ESS VT2 580 SC System; 100% Pre/Post SC Methanol Injection via Howerton Engineering and Aquamist HFS-3; Buckhead Imports Headers (awaiting delivery); Muffler Delete with TimmayTips; Brecus Stage 4 Feramic Clutch; KB BAP; Brembo 355 Front/345 Rear; Dinan Rims; Dinan Oil Cooler; Dinan 3.45 Differential; Dinan Stage 1 Suspension; Dinan Front Strut Brace; Dinan RSB w/ Beastpower Brackets; Matt Martin Monoball Thrust Arm upgrade; Full LED Lighting Conversion; UUC SSK w/ DSSR and ZHP Shift Knob
11.722 seconds 121.040 MPH trap speed (Clemsters Record)


12 Cadillac CTS-V.....LSx with 16psi and Meth. Injection FOR SALE!! Effective 05.15.13
03 CB Biest; 549 RWHP - SOLD but NEVER forgoten

Last edited by havasusteve03Beast; 16th November 2010 at 05:50.
havasusteve03Beast is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to havasusteve03Beast For This Useful Post:
M55555 (16th November 2010)
Old 16th November 2010, 06:37   #68
M55555
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
M55555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: California

Garage: 2001 Carbon Black M5

Sales Feedback: (10)

Thanks: 2,568
Thanked 950 Times in 736 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by havasusteve03Beast View Post
P.S. See if you can do before and after measuremenys and I will do the same!!

Great idea, Steve. What should we measure? Distance between top of collector to chassis? Distance from bottom of collector to ground? Both?
M55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2010, 07:16   #69
havasusteve03Beast
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
havasusteve03Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA US of A
Age: 52

Garage: 2003 E39 M5 TiSi w/ Silverstone interior & 12 Cadillac CTS-V Sedan

Sales Feedback: (50)

Thanks: 1,629
Thanked 973 Times in 589 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by M55555 View Post
Great idea, Steve. What should we measure? Distance between top of collector to chassis? Distance from bottom of collector to ground? Both?
The only place that it makes a difference.....collector to the ground.

Seriously, I will measure from this point before and after. I dont anticipate any change from the tranny mounts, but what the heck, they are easy and with 80,000 could use some fresh rubber. Anxious to see how the motor mounts work. My only fear is actually rasing the motor any more. With the ESS system; Dinan Strut bar and re-mounted oil reservoir, I dont have any room to spare in the vertical height arena.
havasusteve03Beast is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2010, 21:18   #70
M55555
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
M55555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: California

Garage: 2001 Carbon Black M5

Sales Feedback: (10)

Thanks: 2,568
Thanked 950 Times in 736 Posts
From the collector to the ground, before, measured 3.25". It now measures 3.50" after replacing both motor mounts, nothing that dramatically improves ground clearance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by A.Gilli Supersprint View Post
The engine mounts are known to fatigue with time and mileage; when they do sag, even if it's just by a few mm, the entire engine tilts down rearwards, by a x.. amount.
This makes the exhaust headers' exit pipes aim at a lower point than they had been originally designed to.
Here is the reason why our advice is to check the engine and gearbox mounts first, and replace them if necessary.
As a rule of thumb, the proper clearance between the upper collectors and the chassis should be around 1/2".

Alessandro Gilli
Supersprint
Italy
Alessandro - what else can you recommend as to improving ground clearance?
M55555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another Valve clearance question - no special tool just to check clearance? Oversteer E34 M5 Discussion 17 31st August 2010 03:39
ground clearance on a stock m5 99540auto E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 2 27th November 2007 00:46
Ground Clearance compared with 5-series? nlk10010 E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 3 9th January 2004 14:38
Ground Clearance? celler E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 10 5th April 2002 22:19
Ground Clearance Bob R E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 4 5th August 2000 00:55

Loading...

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 00:13.



Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.