Go Back   The Unofficial BMW M5 Messageboard (m5board.com) > BMW M5, M5 Touring, M6 and Z8 Forums > E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion

E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 1998-2003 Advertiser's Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10th July 2009, 06:57   #1
ChaoticZen
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
ChaoticZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NJ
Age: 28

Garage: 2002 Carbon Black ///M5

Sales Feedback: (1)

Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
E39 M5 or Audi RS6?

Hi guys,
I am pretty new here and I am facing a dilemma that keeps me up at night .

I have been searching for the perfect 02-03 E39 M5 for a few months now, until now there is no other car that I know can come close to the perfect balance of the E39 M5, HOWEVER recently sat in my friend's 2003 Audi RS6 and it stirred things up a bit.

I know the board will obviously be a little bit biased, but what do you guys think will be a better all around car?

PS. I have no track experience but with this next purchase I am looking into taking some advance driving courses.
ChaoticZen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 07:13   #2
NJ.M5
Senior Member (>500)
 
NJ.M5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Jersey

Garage: 2001 LMB with Black/Blue interior

Sales Feedback: (1)

Thanks: 7
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
The RS6 is a nice car...but do you really want to spend more money for a less sexy car and NO manual tranny!?!?


Bottom line = in the 21k-25k price range, the e39 M5 is the BEST car you can get for the money right now. BAR none.
__________________
///
NJ.M5 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NJ.M5 For This Useful Post:
jclyman (25th July 2009)
Old 10th July 2009, 13:30   #3
zarnd
Member, P500 Sport, MDM on (>800)
 
zarnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK

Garage: 2002 Le Mans BLue M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 35
Thanked 55 Times in 36 Posts
I kind of know what you mean, they are quite nice to sit in. Only problem with Audi's, in my opinion, is that they are bland to drive, live with, and if it makes sense they don;t have a soul. After i drive my M5 i always turn around and look back at it, and always have a great drive in it. I've driven lots of Audi's, and every single time i drive one i get the same opinion and feedback from it. It's a nice, safe, boring drive to be honest. The 4 wheel drive system is heavy and it doesn't handle as well as the e39 in any guise.

But, you are going to get biased opinions on here. Personally, i would hold out for the right M5. It took me two years to find mine, but it really was worth it!

cheers
__________________
Alex

Nurburgring Trip 2010 - http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/eur...ring-trip.html

2002 M5 - TotalBMW Feature car September 2008
2000 Land Rover Defender - Land Rover World Feature Car June 2007
1989 VW Golf GTI - Track Car
zarnd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 13:53   #4
jmlag
Addicted Member (>300 posts)
 
jmlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Manila, Philippines

Garage: BonitaBeast '03 M5 Schwarz II/Caramel

Sales Feedback: (1)

Thanks: 42
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by zarnd View Post
I kind of know what you mean, they are quite nice to sit in. Only problem with Audi's, in my opinion, is that they are bland to drive, live with, and if it makes sense they don;t have a soul. After i drive my M5 i always turn around and look back at it, and always have a great drive in it. I've driven lots of Audi's, and every single time i drive one i get the same opinion and feedback from it. It's a nice, safe, boring drive to be honest. The 4 wheel drive system is heavy and it doesn't handle as well as the e39 in any guise.

But, you are going to get biased opinions on here. Personally, i would hold out for the right M5. It took me two years to find mine, but it really was worth it!

cheers

Amen Amen Amen....
__________________
BMW CCA NJ #416647

Mostly stock......looking
jmlag is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 14:12   #5
Simonal
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
 
Simonal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom

Garage: Alpina B10 V8S Touring

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 32
Thanked 31 Times in 26 Posts
Got to say I agree with the others.

The RS6 is a nice car and is a great car if you drive a lot in snow/bad weather then great BUT the enjoyment wise there is no contest.

The fact that you would like to take some advanced driving courses means that you can gain more experience in a safe environment i.e. one where you are not going to hurt yourself and I know you are definitely going to have more fun in the E39.

I also think that the E39 looks better although like others I may be bias
The E39 has a balance which is fantastic and allows you to enjoy the car's handling.

The issue with the Audi is that there are only two options grip and then understeer, although you can provoke oversteer by yanking the handbrake but there is less finesse to the handling.

The final thing is that the M5 as a range is iconic and was the modern day instigator of the supersaloon - Saloon looks and Super car performance.

BTW auto transmission does not have to be stopper of fun granted it is not as interactive but in some forms (Alpina and a few others ) it offers another enjoyable option complete with engine braking. Still fun on the track.
Simonal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 14:46   #6
Echo39
Member, Sport: On DSC: On (>100 posts)
 
Echo39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Derbyshire

Garage: 2001 M5 Le Mans

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 46
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Echo39 Send a message via Yahoo to Echo39 Send a message via Skype™ to Echo39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simonal View Post
Got to say I agree with the others.

The RS6 is a nice car and is a great car if you drive a lot in snow/bad weather then great BUT the enjoyment wise there is no contest.

The fact that you would like to take some advanced driving courses means that you can gain more experience in a safe environment i.e. one where you are not going to hurt yourself and I know you are definitely going to have more fun in the E39.

I also think that the E39 looks better although like others I may be bias
The E39 has a balance which is fantastic and allows you to enjoy the car's handling.

The issue with the Audi is that there are only two options grip and then understeer, although you can provoke oversteer by yanking the handbrake but there is less finesse to the handling.

The final thing is that the M5 as a range is iconic and was the modern day instigator of the supersaloon - Saloon looks and Super car performance.

BTW auto transmission does not have to be stopper of fun granted it is not as interactive but in some forms (Alpina and a few others ) it offers another enjoyable option complete with engine braking. Still fun on the track.
What he said

I faced the same dilemma too, but I have always wanted to own an M car, and I have always found BMWs that much better to drive, that said as an everyday car I think the RS6 would have the edge.

Whilst I agree that a manual (keep-fit gears) is the better option for M cars, I can't help feeling that a good auto/DSG/DCT is the way forward. But it depends on drivign style, a manual means you can adopt a more rally/dukes of hazzard style of driving, an auto/DSG/DCT means you adopt a more F1/Indycar style.

Best of all with any M5 - as Si said - it IS the daddy, the definitive, the benchmark and regarded as such the world over.

It is motoring history, and the E39 is the last of the pre-Bangle era.
__________________
~
V8 not G8!!!!!
~
Echo39 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 15:32   #7
mikeoski
Senior Member (>500)
 
mikeoski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Jersey

Garage: 2000 Avus Blue M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to mikeoski
If I recall the RS6 has a twin turbo V8 making 450 HP. It must weigh over 2 tons with the awd. Temperature makes a big difference in power output with FI cars. Being in NJ you will feel the heat soak this time of year.

Get the M5!!!!!!!

I would be happy to take you for a ride in my M5 making 470HP if you live in northern NJ. That will surely help you finalize your decision about what the E39 M5 is all about brother.
__________________
Mike

2000 Avus Blue ///M5

ESS VT550 Supercharger
Dinan Headers and Throttle Bodies
Dinan LTW Flywheel
Diann Exhaust,
Diann 3.45 Differential,
Dinan Stage 3 Suspension
Setrab Oil Cooler
UUC Evo3/DSSR Short Shift Kit
Rogue Power Pulleys
Euro Brake Ducts
StopTech ST-40 Front Brakes
Euro Floating Rotors Rear
StopTech Pads Street/Hawk HT-10 Track
SSR GT7H 9.5" & General UHP Exclaim 275/35R18 Street
SSR Comp 9.5" & Pilot Sport Cups 265/285 Track
H&R 10mm spacers (front)
mikeoski is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 15:59   #8
ChaoticZen
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
ChaoticZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NJ
Age: 28

Garage: 2002 Carbon Black ///M5

Sales Feedback: (1)

Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeoski View Post
If I recall the RS6 has a twin turbo V8 making 450 HP. It must weigh over 2 tons with the awd. Temperature makes a big difference in power output with FI cars. Being in NJ you will feel the heat soak this time of year.

Get the M5!!!!!!!

I would be happy to take you for a ride in my M5 making 470HP if you live in northern NJ. That will surely help you finalize your decision about what the E39 M5 is all about brother.

Coming from a Twin turbo V6 AWD Japanese car (Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4), I actually prefer to go NA now for the simplicity of the engine bay without those extra pipping.

I DO live in north NJ, I actually live in Parsippany and I would LOVE to ride shotgun in your beast if that's not too much trouble!!

After some thinking and more digging around the net, I found out that almost all E39 M5 owners highly highly praised their ride, I guess that's the magic of the ///M
ChaoticZen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 17:22   #9
Chrisfast
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
Chrisfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado

Garage: 02 M5, 03 SL500, 07 A4 2.0T

Sales Feedback: (1)

Thanks: 3
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by zarnd View Post
Only problem with Audi's, in my opinion, is that they are bland to drive, live with, and if it makes sense they don;t have a soul.

I don't agree with this statement at all. If someone thinks that Audi has no soul, they either haven't driven an RS4 (or an R8 for that matter), or are not very open-minded about anything without an M badge. I have said since owning RS4's that I think they are a modern interpretation of the E39 M5. Very mechanical, very engaging to drive, and with better technology. In fact, the only car I probably like more than the M5 is the RS4. But both are phenominal cars. This is a discussion about the RS6 though, not the RS4. I just wanted to go on record when I saw the blanket statement about Audi having no soul.
As far as the RS6 goes, it is a great car. I actually have the opportunity to purchase a 22,000 mile Stage 3 RS6 right now that is pushing around 580 horsepower. It's my friends car and I have played a little with him on the highway just to see. I didn't just loose, I got slaughtered by him. The problem is that while I can pick the car up for a very reasonable price, I will agree with everyone else on the board by saying that it is a pretty boring car other than the power. What a lot of people did forget about the RS6 is that it is also extremely expensive to maintain. It makes our cars look like Honda Civics when comparing maintanence cost. Think of the RS6 as an 850CSI and you'll understand the cost of ownership.
Some things to also consider about the M5 vs RS6 are that the RS6 was a 1 year production car in the US. The M5 was a 3 year, so exclusitivity of the RS6 is much higher. I don't think you're going to run into any problems with seeing M5's all over the place though. They're still somewhat rare.
Either car will make you happy, but in the case of the M5 vs RS6 I truly think the M5 is much more engaging. I also think it is a better looking car (totally subjective). Good luck with your decision.
Chrisfast is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2009, 17:47   #10
gsfent
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
gsfent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: west palm beach. fl.

Garage: 01 M5 Black/caramel

Sales Feedback: (2)

Thanks: 489
Thanked 437 Times in 313 Posts
I have both an M5 and the predessessor to the RS6, a 20020v that now sports about 300 hp and has been tracked dozens of times.

The RS6 has more power, although it pulls a little more weight. 0-60 should be close, with the Audi getting the jump due to AWD, but the M5 catches up at higher speeds(depending on driver, M5 takes more skill).

It is much cheaper to make the Audi go faster. A little more boost goes a long way, and 500 hp is easy and pretty cheap, easily covering the extra weight.

AWD is great in bad weather conditions. That helps on the track, but the extra grip is offset some by the extra weight and the nose heavy condition (close to 60/40). Again, on the track you can rotate the rear under trailing throttle oversteer, but you need to get some speed up, otherwise, the rear grip will cause understeer and nose heavy makes it tougher on brakes and turn in.

Rear seat room is also better, luggage space is better since it is a wagon, and the cabin is on par with the M5, with the gauge set up at least as good as the M5's, although I think the luxury interior on the M5 is one of the nicest ever made by any car company. In caramel, it looks like expensive Italian leather!


Having said all that, the M5 is a much better driver's car. Close to 50/50 weight balance and exceptional driving balance so you can turn the car with the steering wheel and balance with the throttle. The cars drives 400 lbs lighter than it really is. Driving a true manual is a big difference also, and only the M5 has that. If you considering going to the track, then M5 is a hands down winner for fun.

Why not go for a test drive in the Audi, then take a drive in the M5 and make up your own mind! Both great cars, but objectively speaking, the M5 is a far superior driver's car!

Regards,
Jerry
__________________
'01 Black/caramel
Dinan Stage 3 suspension, SS jet coated headers, ESS SC kit w/ 1 range colder NGK's, open brake ducts, Hamann front splitters, TEC cupholder, U.S.(Euro style) tilt/slide armrest, 6k HID fogs, 6k super white low beams, V1/Stealth1, dual head LI, 2.65 diff w/40% lockup/2x dynamic, compact spare, Euro trailer hitch, Mocal oil cooler, ACS type rear spoiler, Rogue custom SSK and tranny mounts, ST 355 BBK (fronts), BP sway bar brackets, Bluetooth retrofit
gsfent is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video: BMW M3 E92 vs Audi RS4 50-250 km/h with cheating Audi driver Gustav E90 M3 Sedan, E92 M3 Coupe, E93 M3 Convertible, E46 M3 and E36 M3, Z4 M and Z4 M Coupe 0 14th October 2008 02:34
Driving Impression: Mercedes CLK350 / Audi RS4 / Audi TT 2.0 , SMG vs DSG SeverelyOpinionated GTBoard.com: General Sportscars 3 17th August 2007 11:02
Pcitures: Audi S6 optic package carbon Audi Exclusive Gustav GTBoard.com: General Sportscars 1 3rd April 2007 17:14
Audi W12 Vs. BMW M5 cgill E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 12 26th December 2006 05:37
Audi releases their 2006 Audi S8 with a V10 FSI engine. yourk GTBoard.com: General Sportscars 26 22nd October 2005 02:34

Loading...
eXTReMe Tracker

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:56.


Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.
Page generated in 0.21573 seconds with 11 queries