Go Back   The Unofficial BMW M5 Messageboard (m5board.com) > BMW M5, M5 Touring, M6 and Z8 Forums > E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion

E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 1998-2003 Advertiser's Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19th September 2008, 13:10   #1
Apeman
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Finland

Garage: E39 M5 '01 Carbon Black

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 9
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
Low-end torque missing, troubleshooting help requested

I had the car dynoed yesterday and this confirmed what my "butt-dyno" had been telling me: a substantial amount of low end torque and some top end power is missing. Adjusted readings are: 265lb/ft at 1500rpm (should be 295), 275lb/ft at 2000rpm (should be 360). 2000rpm is where the biggest difference is compared to reference values. From there the engine slowly picks up and then there is a significant shift at 3200-3400rpm. At 3400rpm the torque is 369lb/ft which is pretty much what it should be. Top end power is down by 5-10%.

The mechanic running the dyno test thought the torque curve suggested a camshaft position issue. He also noted that the car was running lean at lower rpms. Based on the car's test mode I've also noticed that it seems to run lean at the top end, max readings are 115-120l/h (they were 139l/h a year ago).

The fact that the car is running as it should at around 3500-4500rpm might suggest that there are no significant long term fuel trim issues due to e.g. bad O2 sensors? Any thoughts?

Some background information:

MAF:s are more or less new (VAG Bosch sensors, didn't really make much of a difference when I installed them). Low end torque issues were there both before and after installation.

The fuel pump has been changed recently, but the fuel filter hasn't.

O2 sensors have not been changed as far as I know. CO2 readings were mostly fine, and O2 readings through the OBD corresponded well with the exhaust values.

Cats are functional but the mechanic noted that it took quite a while for them to get heated up.

Inspection II was done a year ago (new plugs, filters etc.), the car has run ~8k miles since then. I haven't checked the condition of the plugs though.

The engine has never thrown any fault codes and it runs ok; it just feels (and is) weak at lower rpms. Idle is steady, the only symptom of something being slightly off (besides the power loss) is that the engine is twitching slightly under light throttle for a couple of minutes after a cold start. Also, the engine vibrates a bit, perhaps more than it should, but this could be due to some more physical issues like e.g. bad exhaust mounts or a tired flywheel?

Last edited by Apeman; 19th September 2008 at 13:20.
Apeman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 13:29   #2
jclyman
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
 
jclyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Age: 71

Garage: 2003 M5 - Sterling Grey

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 1,339
Thanked 311 Times in 211 Posts
I would change the fuel filter first and see if anything changes.
__________________
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance; it is the illusion of knowledge."

- Daniel Boorstin

QUICK M5 -- jclymaniii@earthlink.net
jclyman is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 18:01   #3
TopEnd
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
 
TopEnd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: County of KINGS, New York
Age: 24

Garage: 2005 M.Benz E55 AMG

Sales Feedback: (2)

Thanks: 258
Thanked 60 Times in 48 Posts
STUPID BUT VALID QUESTION....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apeman View Post

The engine has never thrown any fault codes and it runs ok; it just feels (and is) weak at lower rpms.

When you turn your ignition to position 2 (engine not running), Does the SES light come on? I'm curious to know if the SES light bulb is working....
TopEnd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 18:16   #4
DouglasABaker
M5 Expert (>4000)
 
DouglasABaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Franklin, MA
Age: 36

Garage: 2002 Chiaretto Red M5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Blog Entries: 6
Thanks: 48
Thanked 1,130 Times in 553 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apeman View Post
I had the car dynoed yesterday and this confirmed what my "butt-dyno" had been telling me: a substantial amount of low end torque and some top end power is missing. Adjusted readings are: 265lb/ft at 1500rpm (should be 295), 275lb/ft at 2000rpm (should be 360). 2000rpm is where the biggest difference is compared to reference values. From there the engine slowly picks up and then there is a significant shift at 3200-3400rpm. At 3400rpm the torque is 369lb/ft which is pretty much what it should be. Top end power is down by 5-10%.

The mechanic running the dyno test thought the torque curve suggested a camshaft position issue. He also noted that the car was running lean at lower rpms. Based on the car's test mode I've also noticed that it seems to run lean at the top end, max readings are 115-120l/h (they were 139l/h a year ago).

The fact that the car is running as it should at around 3500-4500rpm might suggest that there are no significant long term fuel trim issues due to e.g. bad O2 sensors? Any thoughts?

Some background information:

MAF:s are more or less new (VAG Bosch sensors, didn't really make much of a difference when I installed them). Low end torque issues were there both before and after installation.

The fuel pump has been changed recently, but the fuel filter hasn't.

O2 sensors have not been changed as far as I know. CO2 readings were mostly fine, and O2 readings through the OBD corresponded well with the exhaust values.

Cats are functional but the mechanic noted that it took quite a while for them to get heated up.

Inspection II was done a year ago (new plugs, filters etc.), the car has run ~8k miles since then. I haven't checked the condition of the plugs though.

The engine has never thrown any fault codes and it runs ok; it just feels (and is) weak at lower rpms. Idle is steady, the only symptom of something being slightly off (besides the power loss) is that the engine is twitching slightly under light throttle for a couple of minutes after a cold start. Also, the engine vibrates a bit, perhaps more than it should, but this could be due to some more physical issues like e.g. bad exhaust mounts or a tired flywheel?
Rough idle and lack of low end torque sounds like a cam position issue, but I'd start with JClyman's idea and look at other contributing items as well. My suspicion is that there is nothing wrong with your VANOS, but rather that some combination of sensors is sending inaccurate data to the DME and is causing the DME to call for inappropriate cam positions.

What codes were you able to pull from the car? Reset, wait a week, and pull again. Post those and we'll be able to help more. Pretty much guaranteed that you have them, even with no SES (mostly triggered by emissions in the states).

d-
DouglasABaker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 18:23   #5
TMcNasty
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
 
TMcNasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ewing, NJ

Garage: '03 M5 - LMB/Blk int./Alu. trim

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 159
Thanked 188 Times in 142 Posts
How many miles on your car?

If I were you I'd change the fuel filter. There was another recent post where a guy got an extra ~20L/hr just by doing that. And you just got a new pump...there is a chance that is died early due to stress! I got one online for $23.

Don't underestime the ability of lazy pre-cat O2's to f with your power. I saw you keeping up w/ SleeperE39's power loss thread. Granted he had exhaust cracks so his sensors may have been okay, but it still proves that bad readings from the O2's can rob the power. I got a set from Amazon for $110 shipped a month ago.

8k on air filters? Not too high, but for the price of new why not toss a set in...just to see results.

Were the proper NGK plugs installed at inspection II?

Does your car pass the onboard test for the thermostat operation?

Another recent topic was the power robbing effects of a stuck cooling fan because of a defective fan clutch. Is your fan clutch ok? Search for threads.

Last edited by TMcNasty; 19th September 2008 at 18:28.
TMcNasty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TMcNasty For This Useful Post:
jclyman (19th September 2008)
Old 19th September 2008, 18:31   #6
TMcNasty
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
 
TMcNasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ewing, NJ

Garage: '03 M5 - LMB/Blk int./Alu. trim

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 159
Thanked 188 Times in 142 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DouglasABaker View Post
Pretty much guaranteed that you have them, even with no SES (mostly triggered by emissions in the states).

d-
Good catch d...didn't see he was in Finland. Do euro cars have no SES light...or is it just much harder to get it to come on?
TMcNasty is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 18:53   #7
ard
Moderator
 
ard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sierra foothills, CA, USA

Garage: 2003 E39 M5, 2004 996TT X50

Sales Feedback: (1)

Thanks: 433
Thanked 559 Times in 385 Posts
Remember, this is not a USA model so CEL will not be set like it will over there. (Edit: TM- almost any code in USA will set the light, only a few codes set the CEL in EU)

To the OP- you are pulling codes using the OBD port, correct? There are none?

How about any GT1 results?

Definitely reolace the fuel filter, assume air filter is new?.... then look at GT1/other results for o2 and fuel trim.

A

Last edited by ard; 19th September 2008 at 18:55.
ard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 19:30   #8
Apeman
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Finland

Garage: E39 M5 '01 Carbon Black

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 9
Thanked 22 Times in 19 Posts
Thanks for all the comments. The SES light is working, and as I said the car has never thrown any codes (checked with two types of readers including GT1 at main BMW dealer). The last check was after the dyno test, not with GT1 but still through the OBD port.

O2 sensor adaption values were -2.1% and 0%, doesn't sound that alarming to me. Other O2 readings seemed fine as well, basically just what would be expected (pre- and post cat O2 sensors correlated well, no real variation between left/right sensors and and exhaust analysis confirmed the readings). That said, I might still change the O2 sensors if I don't find any other clear causes.

Inspection II was performed at the main official BMW dealer in Finland, so I assume they put in the correct plugs.

Thermostat test has not been run (don't know the procedure), but I get the same readings from the dashboard and from the OBC.

The cooling fan is not stuck as far as I know. Definitely not running all the time and it seems to run as expected when the engine/air is hot.

The car has run 72k miles. Air filters and oil filter have run 8k. I have a time booked next Thursday at the official dealer, so I hope to find out more then. I will definitely have the fuel filter changed, and I've also requested that the vanos solenoid O-rings be changed even if there are no clear indications of malfunction.

Last edited by Apeman; 19th September 2008 at 19:32.
Apeman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 20:15   #9
ard
Moderator
 
ard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sierra foothills, CA, USA

Garage: 2003 E39 M5, 2004 996TT X50

Sales Feedback: (1)

Thanks: 433
Thanked 559 Times in 385 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apeman View Post
I have a time booked next Thursday at the official dealer, so I hope to find out more then. I will definitely have the fuel filter changed, and I've also requested that the vanos solenoid O-rings be changed even if there are no clear indications of malfunction.
You should ask them to run a full VANOS test. Make sure you are getting appropriate actuation across the full RPM band.

I really HATE suggesting this, but I wonder if you want to look at your CPS sensors. There are SOME reports that these can start to fail and NOT throw codes, yet have symptoms..... worth thinking about I guess.

A
ard is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 20:17   #10
mfizzlenyc
m5board.comoholic (>1000 posts)
 
mfizzlenyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Socal

Garage: 2000 m5 silverstone

Sales Feedback: (2)

Thanks: 156
Thanked 62 Times in 53 Posts
CPS Sensors....
__________________
2000 Silverstone M5 extended Leather

BBS LMs 19s ,StopTech BBK,Dinan Headers Dinan CF -CAI,Dinan light weight flywheel,Dinan stage 3 suspension, Dinan stage 4 software ,Dinan 3.45 Diff,Dinan Mufflers,SS race cats ,SS x pipe,Rogue SSK , Euro Headlights -ibright v3,MRTM Pedal set, updated steering wheel ,16:9 nav ,Active Auto brake ducts

2009 135 Space gray Black Boston Extended Leather
mods- Bmw Performance Black kidney grills,

1988 10th anniversary Rx7 turbo-mods... 93 rotors 3mm seals streetported lapped and balanced 6 puck non organic clutch Turbo back exhaust blah blah blah

1972 Corvette Stingray 454 4 speed man. Show car condition -FOR SALE
mfizzlenyc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
INCREASE BOTTOM END TORQUE? justblaze E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 23 11th September 2008 01:52
Just intalled Sec 1&2 MST GT Exhaust -Loss of low end torque? Rated///M E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 14 29th August 2008 09:16
Troubleshooting missing under full throttle/SES light? 12sec4dr E39 M5 and E52 Z8 Discussion 1 29th September 2006 20:56
E60 M5 and low end torque greer E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 11 31st August 2006 07:02
low end torque ajinfante E34 M5 Discussion 10 20th June 2006 14:48

eXTReMe Tracker

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:43.


Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.
Page generated in 0.17765 seconds with 11 queries