Go Back   The Unofficial BMW M5 Messageboard (m5board.com) > BMW M5, M5 Touring, M6 and Z8 Forums > E34 M5 Discussion

E34 M5 Discussion 1988-1995 Sedan and Touring

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 6th June 2009, 04:38   #1
93FIM5
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fountain, Colorado USA

Garage: 1993 M5 Black

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
E34 M5 Air Intake Review/Build

Hey everyone this is the same type of idea that I'm currently working on at bimmerforums for the M30 but since I actually own an M5 it will be moving a little quicker. Along with some help from some members from this board (roortube) I'm looking to work towards putting together a sort of DIY PDF file of hard numerical data that all E34 M5 owners can refer to for restrictions, and heat soak in the intake as well as modifications and fixes that improve flow and heat resistance. So I was hoping to use this as a sort of development area that members could contribute their ideas and concerns about intake development in, after all thats what forums are for. So as we gather data and develop modifications they will be posted up on here for everyone to see and comment on.

First off we are going to try and identify the restrictions and heat soak that exists in the S38 intake system from the air intake point (behind the headlights) to the plenum inlet. This will allow us to quantify which components among the air snorkel, filter housing, filter, velocity stack, MAF, and the rubber boot contribute the most to inlet restriction. With this information we will then go about designing a more efficient overall replacement system, if its even needed!

I have a few instruments and a pretty decent machine shop with composites ability at my disposal that should allow us to do this, so within a week or so I should be able to get all of the testing equipment and procedures put together and shipped off to roortube to begin some initial testing. Also just to get it out of the way yes this is a major undertaking and is going to take alot of work and contribution from this boards members but I say we might as well get this started, what are your guys concerns/wishes?
93FIM5 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2009, 23:19   #2
Dragonsi
Junior Member, warming up (<31 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IL

Garage: e34 m5

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The actual velocity stacks are small. I learned this from a member's thread who was comparing the stacks of an s54 to an s38. I 've always wandered how much of a hassle it would be to delete the air pump, would it throw any codes?
Dragonsi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2009, 23:26   #3
Lantz
Member, P500, DSC On (>600)
 
Lantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London/Sweden/Brussels

Garage: BMW M5 E34 Granitsilber Metallic 3.8

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 69
Thanked 59 Times in 44 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsi View Post
The actual velocity stacks are small. I learned this from a member's thread who was comparing the stacks of an s54 to an s38. I 've always wandered how much of a hassle it would be to delete the air pump, would it throw any codes?
Check out our Wout's 'Major Wrenching' thread, he deleted the airpump amongst other things. Very thorough and enjoyable thread!

I will be looking forward to this threads development, however even with my limited mechanical/engineering (none) experience, I feel little will be gained over stock.

Lantz

Last edited by Lantz; 6th June 2009 at 23:26. Reason: Post Red Wine sentencing ;)
Lantz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 03:43   #4
roortube
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Baltimore

Garage: 1991 Dinan M5, black; 1993 s4/rs2; 1969 Lotus Elan +2S130

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 13
Thanked 38 Times in 24 Posts
I think I'm gonna enjoy this. Even if there's little improvement, it'll be fun to play with this stuff and see what happens. I can't wait to see what kind of stuff 93FIM5 has in mind.
roortube is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2009, 06:31   #5
93FIM5
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fountain, Colorado USA

Garage: 1993 M5 Black

Sales Feedback: (0)

Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsi View Post
The actual velocity stacks are small. I learned this from a member's thread who was comparing the stacks of an s54 to an s38. I 've always wandered how much of a hassle it would be to delete the air pump, would it throw any codes?
The velocity stack I'm referring too is the feed to the MAF sensor not the velocity stacks that serve the ITB's.

With regards to the velocity stacks that reside in the plenum the member your referring to (Will) and I have talked quite a bit about creating a hybrid S38/S54 stack that maintains the tuned length of the S38 stacks while at the same time adopting the inlet and throat shape of the S54 stacks as it looks to promote low rpm cylinder filling with its tear drop shape without hurting high rpm to a great extent (BMW's F1 group had a hand in designing them). Integrating a hybrid s38/s54 velocity stack would take a lot of work and research and would require a complete redesign of the plenum itself to accommodate this shape of the stack due to the length of the teardrop which requires the upper chamber of the plenum to be deeper but at the same time you have to maintain other critical geometries due to the way the plenum functions with the length and width of the chambers not being able to be modified without causing detriment to the tuning of the variable resonance system. Once we get the front portion (Plenum forward) of the intake system tweaked it may be possible to play around with the idea of a hybrid velocity stack setup. But that would definitely be a major undertaking to create a stack and plenum system that maintained OEM functionality of the variable resonance system (remember the CSL and thus the S54 don't need the variable resonance plenum because they have VANOS, and in my opinion a more low rpm friendly velocity stack!) but at the same time created better low rpm cylinder filling through the hybrid stacks, this may be beyond our reach but that's no reason not to do some research and try! That seemed like a jumbled reply if it is let me know and I can try and be more clear.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lantz View Post
Check out our Wout's 'Major Wrenching' thread, he deleted the airpump amongst other things. Very thorough and enjoyable thread!

I will be looking forward to this threads development, however even with my limited mechanical/engineering (none) experience, I feel little will be gained over stock.

Lantz
You have a good point the OEM system is well designed and I doubt they left much on the table in terms of power. But they did have internal and external NVH regulations and accountant's to answer too that I'm sure affected the design of the intake. Hopefully we will be able to quantify the areas that can be improved and then see if we can actually improved them.

Roortube and other members have mentioned a few things they would like to see in any potential intake system that potentially comes of this, mainly protection from a failed radiator and the ingestion of coolant as well as an improved intake sound. Along with those points I'd like to see the following.

- OEM BMW/Mahle/Mann filter element for ease of replacement, reliability, and quality.
- Proper sealed heat shield for the intake setup.
- Prepreg composite construction for heat rejection, low weight, and durability
- Improved internal geometries
- Improved/additional air intake point(s) with positive (It will be a small amount!) pressure at speed to try and lessen some of the existing restrictions (MAF, filter element, geometry). Think similar to the OEM E92 M3 air intake setup as seen below.

So again I'm sure we will find some areas to improve but we won't know till we start testing!

Quote:
Originally Posted by roortube View Post
I think I'm gonna enjoy this. Even if there's little improvement, it'll be fun to play with this stuff and see what happens. I can't wait to see what kind of stuff 93FIM5 has in mind.
As far as test equipment goes we have two differential pressure gauges along with a modified OEM intake (Im providing off of my car, which makes me all the more willing to get this done!) to measure restriction points along the intake path as well as to find possible high pressure air intake areas to help overcome restrictions (MAF, filter, and geometries) that will exist even in the optimized system. Along with the gauges there is a dual input thermometer for analyzing heat gains across the system and for optimizing intake points as well as a laser thermometer for surface temperature readings (helps to optimize the heat shield). At the moment I'm working on modifying my OEM system for the research as well as writing down some notes for Roortube for testing, see below for a quick pic of the equipment.

Anyways keep the input coming guys!
Attached Images
  
93FIM5 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post! Add this post to your Facebook Profile Add this post to MySpaceStumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AFE Intake Dyno and Review! avi8tir E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 108 27th October 2009 07:31
M5 Stroker Review - 500 miles, longer review darren_dallas E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 29 27th September 2008 19:37
M5 Stroker Review - 1st 250 miles, *big* review darren_dallas E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 46 26th September 2008 19:42
Timeline of E60 M5 Build--How Long it Takes from Build to Drive MJ E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 38 21st October 2005 03:43
Good review of SMGIII in Automobile's M6 review MRichmond E60 M5 and E61 M5 Touring Discussion 61 6th July 2005 01:03

eXTReMe Tracker

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:08.


Everything Copyright 2000-2008. Do not use ANYTHING from this site without written permission. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text appearing on this web site are the exclusive property of m5board.com and are protected under international copyright laws. All images, graphics, sound files, video files and text on this site are for on-screen and on-site viewing and listening only. No part of this web site may be reproduced, copied, saved, stored, manipulated, or used in any form for personal or commercial purposes without the prior written permission of m5board.com. Use of any image or graphic as the basis for another photographic concept or illustration is a violation of the copyright. Any copyright infringement will be prosecuted to the full extent of federal and international copyright laws. M5board.com is an enthusiast board and we don't condone any dangerous activity. Our airfield events are completely safe based on years of experience, we conduct them during clear visibility with mature participants that have several years of experience with high-performance automobiles, large unobstructed run-off zones on sealed off private former military airbases and we clearly mark the braking zones. If inexperienced with high speed driving we do not recommend organizing your own event but attending a high-performance driving school. The use of the term "BMW" on this site is for reference only, and does not imply any connection between m5board.com and BMW AG or BMW North America.
Page generated in 0.16426 seconds with 12 queries