Quote:
Originally Posted by rstringer
Hm interesting I would have an issue with the S38 if that is the case. And how about the handling? which car has less body roll and which corners better?
Cheers,
Rob
|
The E39 is actually quite softly sprung & damped.
Its quite a balanced package but has alot of rubber isolators & bushes
in the suspension.
Plus point = refined & low NVH.
Minus point = wear & general vagueness for the enthusiast, hence
the proliferation of Eurathane bush kits for almost everywhere on E39.
The other factor is traction aids.
The firmer you make a cars ride with stiffer roll rates etc, the harder it
becomes for the 2 stage traction aid calibration to reign the car in.
There is little doubt that changing a cars handling characteristics with
stiffer dampers & springs, bushes, rollbars, brakes & bigger wheels moves the car
outside the original design envelope for the the traction control catchnet.
One would assume that owners doing these mods realise that the traction
control system is profiled for a std vehicle.
Ie, its calibrated reactive system with adaptation values for the std car.
It does not pre-empt.
I prefer the E34.
Its raw.
Its handbuilt ( unfortunately, that also appears to be the case where
subsequent owners have been having a little play !)
It requires some thought to drive it well in wet conditions.
But...an E39 will disapear from view as you fight to keep an E34 sticky side
down under this scenario.
Thats progress I guess.
In the dry, handling wise, the cars are very very close to each other.
Find a good E34//M5 & you won't be disapointed.
Farrell