|
18th September 2001, 07:39
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 62
Posts: 2,125
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
V-10 again
October Car and Driver said maybe a 500 HP V-10 for the next M5 and M6.
Sound familiar?
__________________
-Bart
2002 Bluewater/caramel
Any other car is a compromise
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 08:08
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
M5 Expert (>4000)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So Cal
Age: 90
Posts: 5,375
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Yup sounds familiar... now the question... will it really happen...
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 08:26
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sherman Oaks, California, US
Posts: 284
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well, think about it logically. BMW needs to compete with Mercedes who will soon be supercharging their already powerful 5.4 liter V8. This supercharged version of the engine will be going into the next generation E55 AMG. Motorsport likes to stick with normally aspirated engines so in order to keep up with Merc's supercharged 5.4, heading to a V10 seems like the thing to do. One might think that BMW can just tweek the current engine and get it up to a 500 hp 4.9 liter V8, and they can, BUT with that kind of horsepower/liter ratio, the engine would sound like that of the E46 M3 or the Honda S2000, a high, loud, toy-car-like buzz that M5 owners on the whole don't really go for. A V10 would keep the sound harmonious and eloquent, similar to the pleasant ROAR we have now.
My point here is simply that upgrading to a V10 sounds like the nest logical step in M5 evolution. It is controversial for BMW to put a V10 in a 5-series, just like putting a V8 in a 3-series seems to ruin the point (possibly why there only selling about 10 of those and they're only doing that to make the V10 M3 eligible for racing as a production based car), but the alternative, a Cheverolet-like 5.7 liter V8 to get the extra power just seems wierd- 5.7 liters in BMW speak is a V12.
Last point, how do we compete with Merc's wussy supercharging?
Anyway, I'll stop rambling now, that's my 2cents.
///Brandon
///Brandon
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 10:32
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 26
Posts: 2,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I encountered this old generation M6 owner the other day and he was telling me how both the M5 and M6 will share the same V-10 engine but with more horsepower in the M6. If the speculations are true...watch the 360 Modena trying to follow the M5 in straight forward acceleration...that means a new meal for the future beast
__________________
2006 Interlagos Blue M5 - My father's
2007 VW Golf GTI - My little rocket!
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 11:08
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member (>500)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 728
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hello Kid,
Quote:
Originally posted by TheM5Kid
Last point, how do we compete with Merc's wussy supercharging?
|
What is wrong with supercharging? Actually, I like it a lot, because it lets one burn lots more air and fuel in a piston of a given size and stroke....
Don't fall into the error of saying, "it only pulls at high RPM." Think of it as, "it pulls MORE at high RPM." Way more....
Some people around here claim that the Dinan supercharger will be able to get 550bhp... than will be nice! Would you turn the power down just because it was supercharged? I wouldn't. (Although I'm not sure what I would need more power for, given that the M5 will be plenty strong for drifts and donuts, what I find interesting.)
And why is a V10 so interesting? The only advantage that I can see is that you can split the cylinder volume up in 10ths, which means smaller cylinders, which might mean a higher red line... and that Honda-like sound again. (Personally, I love high RPMs and huge turbo boost, but I wonder how long an engine like that could last before it needs repair?)
Finally, note that you can get a lot more energy per liter out of an engine with boost, which saves you weight!
Actually, I think that Mercedes is doing the right thing. When they replace the slush box with a sequential manual gearbox, I'll suddenly be very interested in a Mercedes.
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 14:18
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Stuttgart(BENZ-TOWN), Germany
Age: 25
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Mercedes is already supercharging their 5.5L V8. In the new Mercedes SL 55 AMG the equipped the engine with a kompressor and it has now an amazing 476HP(350KW) and 700NM.
This engine makes the SL 55 fly from 0-100kph in only 4.7s and this is with a 5-speed autobox
If the put this engine in the E-Class BMW will definitely have to upgrade the M5. I think they should implant the McLaren F1 V12 with 627HP because with this powerhouse they could kick the SL 55, the new E55 and even the Brabus E V12 7.3L
Regards Stefan
__________________
Hell yes, Street Race
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 15:23
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,200
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
The McLaren-engine would be nice but the price of the car would be pretty expensive hence the app. $120000 engine...
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 16:09
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: Off DSC: On (>50 posts)
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Age: 36
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Gotta say the price would become pretty prohibitive...
I think they will have to do something to keep up with MB tho...
Al
__________________
'03 SS
Still dreaming of the M5
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 17:16
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: On DSC: On (>100 posts)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Chester, NJ, USA
Posts: 195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I believe the McLaren comes with gold foil engine bay insulation and $14,000 servicing costs ... might restrict a few of us from ownership if applied to the next M5. A V-10 will allow BMW to align their production car marketing (and manufacture to some extent) with their F1 program. I'm all eager for a 550 bhp (BMW: please note - this is the magic number required to stay at the top of the heap). I'd expect a larger displacement than the current M5 with an 8-9000 rpm redline. Sound ... I don't care, I'm sure it would be great but a Ferrari scream at high rpm would be ideal.
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 18:23
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
M5 Guru (>2000 posts)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 62
Posts: 2,125
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I would like to see a 6.0L V-8. Same basics with more displacement.
Fine tune the intake, exhaust, etc.
There are some American tuners, as Lingenfelter, that take a Chevy V-8 and make an unbelieveable amount of HP. And it is very tractable, reliable. The cams are not too extreme.
__________________
-Bart
2002 Bluewater/caramel
Any other car is a compromise
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 18:41
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: South of England
Age: 23
Posts: 5,175
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I would love to see a V-10 550 hp you hearing this BMW???
|
|
|
18th September 2001, 19:02
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Member, Sport: On DSC: Off
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 217
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I do find the idea of a V10 5 series interesting, but personally, what would please me even more would be putting the M5 on a diet. Of course a lighter and more powerfur car I probably wouldn't turn down...
|
|
| | |